I’ve railed against this in the media that we are a part of, and the way that the propaganda reacts to this is, “Ignore it. Ignore all of this.” I’m saying this now because the general public has to be the one that gets angry. The general public should be furious at the way people have been treated in the country by suppression of these drugs, by that kind of website that suppresses the ability of doctors to practice medicine.

is perspective, highlights of the event, which attracted nearly 1,000 delegates, making it the largest C19 conference ever in the world.

“We have a covid protocol; it’s a standard. You cannot go outside of it,” said the long-time nurse who did not want to be named for fear of being fired. “It breaks your heart that these people have been receiving this and don’t survive, and there are alternatives that are actually available that are not being used.”

South Africa’s excess mortality trends may shed further light on the efficacy of various interventions. Upon publicly announcing its intentions to secure an HCQ supply, overall excess deaths trended negative, as is often the case following a surge as most surges in excess mortality take place among the most frail who would otherwise make up a substantial portion of those who might have died in upcoming weeks or months. However, excess deaths did not revert particularly sharply after cessation of HCQ usage or upon introduction of vaccines. Each gave way to new waves of mortality.

Whatever one thinks about COVID vaccines and their associated risks, it is important to understand the protocols frontline physicians have developed to treat the COVID infected, and conclude that authorities should not interfere with their prescriptions and practices–all of which have been amply studied.

According to Zelenko, “HCQ is the safest medication in the history of medicine, azithromycin is one of the most common antibiotics used in medicine, and zinc is a mineral that’s well-known and well-tolerated. These drugs were affordable and available to take at home, which was very important. And they worked.”

In this interview, Dr. Peter McCullough discusses the importance of early treatment for COVID-19, and the potential motivations behind the suppression of safe and effective treatments.

“A Guide to Home-Based COVID Treatment” by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons includes life-saving best practices for early treatment in an easy-to-understand document for doctors and patients.

Be clear about the science explaining why IVM and HCQ have worked. They both (along with zinc) interfere at the earliest stage of COVID infection with viral replication. Stops infection in its tracks. They work as prophylactics for the same reason. If you keep a modest amount of IVM and HCQ in your body (and take zinc, vitamins C and D, and quercetin) any virus that enters your body can be stopped before major viral replication. The new prescription medicines coming from Merck and other Big Pharma are designed to serve the same function as the cheap generics.

“Early treatment should have been part of the equation. I’m not against all those other things. Contagion control is important. Washing our hands. Things like that. They’re all important. Do we need vaccination programs? Absolutely. Do we need early treatment programs? Absolutely. So we have basically put the cart before the horse. The tail is wagging the dog. Early treatment should be a mainstay for everything.”

In this tweet, Dr. Robert Malone links here to a page on the globalcovidsummit.org website (in honor of the COVID-19 Summit in Rome) noting that over 3,900 physicians and medical scientists (passed 4,200 now) have signed the Rome Declaration in protest. The declaration was initially passed through the circles of those who attended Rome and gathered in San Juan, but is now open to all physicians and medical scientists. If that includes you, please read it and consider signing.

A board-certified family medical physician who works with Dr. George Fareed in California’s Imperial Valley, Dr. Brian Tyson states that, based on his work with more than 6,000 Covid patients, 70% of all cases nationwide could have been saved using his early-treatment methods.

In San Juan, Puerto Rico, a panel of doctors and scientists convened in an open forum about effective early treatment and evaluated the current one-size-fits-all approach to the treatment of Covid.

It does not appear that mass vaccination has yet reduced Costa Rica’s climbing COVID-19 case explosion or mounting death toll.

Concerned about the potential for a more substantial outbreak of the fast-spreading coronavirus, Uganda jumped on the quickly-growing hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) HCQ bandwagon, most often using it as part of a multi-drug regimen in combination with azithromycin, zinc, vitamin C and vitamin D. Through mid-July, Uganda had seen over 1,000 cases of COVID-19 without a single fatality—the largest such “perfect record” in the world at that point in time.

We are pleased to present a webinar about a crucial topic: the early treatment of those catching COVID-19, especially with the Delta variant.

Dr Stramezzi talks about his experience, his perspectives on treatment of Covid-19, his telemedicine service & the upcoming International Covid Summit in Rome in September.

This interview with Steve Kirsch features early treatment, vaccination, government responses to pandemics, tech companies & freedom of expression.

A victory for Immanuel in court would be a powerful rebuke to the propaganda machine set up to maximize profits for Big Pharma.

This interview features Dr Caxton Opere, who has not only treated C19 patients but also written 3 books about it, the first one in early April 2020.

I am undergoing a brutal cancelation and moral assassination attempt at my university for defending early treatment. Early treatment is effective and denying it today is causing death and suffering.

The data from the vaccine trials must be recalculated under the lens that some of the serious adverse events (SAEs) should be treated as COVID-19 cases.
There may not be any vaccine efficacy in the data at all if some of the post-vaccination deaths are due to vaccine-induced COVID-19. It could even be the case that the mortality efficacy goes negative. My implied lives saved calculations put this easily in the realm of possibility. The only way to know is for authorities to organize and compile the data. And while a risk analysis is certainly due after more than six months of hundreds of millions of doses delivered, there is little indication authorities have bothered with the process. That’s more than a bit unsettling.

The Roman/Hernandez meta-analysis comes at a politically contentious moment. Their language and behavior appear political. Their work is error-laden, takes research out of its true context, uses numbers that don’t seem to come from the actual studies, chooses papers testing ivermectin under the least favorable circumstances, gives unexplained and inappropriate weights to the small amount of data that stands as outliers to the bigger picture, and still drives a conclusion of “don’t use this” from a massive average mortality reduction that did not quite reach statistical significance. At the same time the authors consistently complain about the “low quality of evidence” represented by the studies they do and do not include, nearly all of which I would describe as produced by higher quality scientists who can at least tally numbers correctly.

The death rate from COVID-19 is dramatically low at United Memorial Medical Center in Houston, TX compared to other hospitals across the nation and the world. Despite Dr. Joseph Varon’s popularity on TV, news personalities avoid questions of why he’s having success treating his patients. As it turns out, he’s using drugs the WHO and CDC recommend against.

The results not only provide a structural basis for the anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity of HCQ, but also renders HCQ to be the first known drug capable of targeting LLPS.

The SOLIDARITY and RECOVERY protocols look prima facie like staged sabotage.I drew a picture to make the point: The WHO could not have plausibly chosen a less optimal treatment protocol.

“For science to work, you have to have an open exchange of ideas,” Bhattacharya said of the censorship. “If you’re going to make an argument that something is misinformation, you should provide an actual argument. You can’t just take it down and say, ‘Oh, it’s misinformation’ without actually giving a reason.

During the first wave, the primary antiviral used was HCQ, and during the second wave (after Facebook censored his account where he was communicating with others in a large nation) they shifted to ivermectin due to HCQ controversies. Similarly to the way Dr. Brian Tyson attacked COVID-19 with an early multi-drug regimen, numerous other medicines, including aspirin, were used. Of Dr. Shah’s 8,000 or so patients, only 5 succumbed to COVID-19. This is notably similar to the results of Dr. Didier Raoult.

This is pulled straight from the same playbook as the propaganda against HCQ. Even if you’re not sure that one or both of these medicines is effective despite uniformly positive results when applied as early treatment, you should at least recognize the pattern, scratch your head, and question whether there is…maybe…just possibly some perverse incentive like power or profit from vaccines driving this absurdity.

There are so many ways to attack this virus, so we’ll move forward with an argument that SARS-CoV-2 is far easier to handle than its public image suggests.

Over 10,000 patients,a fatality rate more than 97% LOWER than France’s – an exceptional case for early treatment with a drug regimen including HCQ & AZM.

McCullough walks through a thorough (if basic) coverage of many drugs and nutraceuticals that have been effectively used around the world—the best single such coverage seen packed into one video.

A medical doctor and scientist, Dr Urso is one of the most prominent C19 doctors in the US. Since March 2020, he has treated hundreds of patients at home, on an ambulatory basis. In this interview, he tells us about his experience, about C19 in Texas and about the America’s Frontline Doctors movement.

Doctors have found safe, effective and inexpensive treatments that work well in preventing and treating patients with COVID-19 like Ivermectin that’s been used safely for more than 30 years.
But the government has not supported the use of this effective drug. In fact, there are other therapies like hydroxychloroquine, vitamins D and C and zinc that physicians have found to be safe and effective in preventing and treating COVID.

But while political psychology did its thing, making HCQ a no go zone for many physicians, Tyson and his staff simply treated patients according to whatever seemed to work, using HCQ as a primary option. And work it did.

Source: Francesoir Italy has been talked about a lot since the start of the Covid crisis in 2020 with first of all a significant mortality …

Significant QT prolongation was not observed during the follow‐up period compared with the baseline values in the present study. No ventricular arrhythmias, second and third‐degree heart blocks, or severe pauses were recorded during the treatment period.

Today, most leading doctors in India are themselves not promoting the Ministry of Health guidelines that includes the use of hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin and inhaled budesonide.

“It [nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize] gives credibility to the message,” Dr. Zelenko said. “Which is, treat Covid-19 early and live.”

So, what’s different between Maharashtra and Delhi with respect to the rest of India and South Asia? Instead of relying on HCQ and IVM, many doctors and health officials in Maharashtra and Delhi pushed the expensive and profitable remdesivir drug. Due to its cost and recommended time of usage, remdesivir is not used either as a prophylaxis or for early outpatient treatment. And unlike the cheap and easy-to-produce HCQ and IVM, remdesivir is difficult to replace when it runs out.

The sales of hydroxychloroquine in the Chinese market have been rising steadily, from CNY 258 million in 2016 to CNY 343 million in 2020, with a CAGR of 7.34% from 2016 to 2020. In 2020, China’s sales of hydroxychloroquine were CNY 343 million, a slight increase of 0.71% than 2019.

Every viral illness starts that way. The more it’s allowed to progress, the more it takes over the cells and replicates itself. That’s why this virus absolutely had to be treated early to prevent those damages. Primarily what has killed people with COVID is a delay to treatment, and allowing the exaggerating inflammatory response and blood clotting response to take hold in the body.

In an interview with Alan Jones, Craig Kelly MP discusses the vaccine rollout mishaps and yet again, rightfully points out the myriad of medical specialists around the world who support the use of ivermectin for the prophylaxis and treatment of their Covid-19 patients with the backup of extensive positive data.

It would be a historically amazing feat of maneuvering bureaucracy, worthy of its own epic book, movie, or perhaps a campfire song, to have wrangled that much data out of those hospitals with highly variable regulations and procedures, nearly all of which are in the U.S. healthcare system.

Hydroxychloroquine also can act as an oral hypoglycemic agent, as patients with diabetes taking hydroxychloroquine for rheumatologic diseases had a significant reduction in hemoglobin A1c when compared to methotrexate,40 and thus can serve to reduce hyperglycemia, a possible COVID‐19 risk factor for disease severity.

Immediately following HCQ’s Trump moment, the media went on an all-out blitz to associate the topic of HCQ with a sense of fear. Fear of Trump, fear of death, fear of incompetence, fear of opposing scientific authorities, fear of using medicine needed by somebody else, and fear of the unknown. And the campaign of fear didn’t stop there.

The authors emphasize the historically significant & relevant role of empiric treatment in an attempt to reduce death. Doing nothing is not good medicine.

One of the most disturbing aspects of the COVID-19 pandemic is the strange singularity of the ultimate solution, or at least the one preferred by the world’s most powerful people and their media: vaccines.

We discussed the Surgisphere debacle and other stories of “engineered research” during the pandemic, most of which I am currently preparing articles about.

While HCQ looks very safe overall for COVID-19 patients, it looks safest when used as a prophylactic or therapeutic for early stage COVID-19 patients, once again affirming the Primary HCQ Hypothesis as the strongest version of the HCQ Hypothesis.

Source: Rounding the Earth Author: Mathew Crawford The story of why hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has not been used broadly in most Western nations (primarily in the …

From an ingenious intuition of the founder, Mauro Rango, an Italian living in the Mauritius Islands. There, the Coronavirus was quickly eradicated in the beginning, with drugs that we have known for decades, such as Azithromycin, Hydroxychloroquine or Cortisone, while in Italy people died like flies. How was it possible that in Africa, where health care is not as advanced as in Italy, such marvellous results were achieved, while in Italy the spread of the disease could not be contained?

The big problem is that people do not recognize that the treatment works. Lives are thus endangered. They listen to people who are not caring for patients.

Portuguese doctors reacted: since the prescription of hydroxychloroquine was forbidden to them, they fell back on ivermectin and administered it more and more massively.

The Hydroxychloroquine Hypothesis: That there is some appropriate dosage of hydroxychloroquine, alone or in some combination with other medication, that successfully prevents some COVID-19 cases (PrEP/PEP) or treats some COVID-19 sufferers (Early/Late/Critical).
Remaining entirely unblemished after a year of trials and observations, the current evidence in favor of the Primary HCQ Hypothesis fully validates the HCQ Hypothesis. The logic is so simple that it almost feels like your livelihood would have to be on the line to deny it.

This is now one of the most well-studied treatments in the history of medicine, and the evidence is overwhelming. The chance that these results could occur at random is approximately 1 in 208 quadrillion. That is, p = 0.000000000000048. Having read a few thousand research papers, I have never before seen a p-value this low in the testing of medicine.

India has conquered the disease with hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, uses a traditional vaccine, exports experimental vaccines for these idiotic Westerners … There are 1,230 deaths per million inhabitants over 65 (six times less than in France). If we had listened to Raoult and followed the Indian model, today we would have 500 cases of covid per day and 75,000 fewer deaths …

If the argument rests on “RCTs as the gold standard”, there is little doubt that the evidence dramatically favors using HCQ as a standard early stage therapeutic! But it is reasonable to assess the quality of all the evidence to reach beyond gold for the ultimate and supreme standards of scientific evidence. That too we plan to present in future articles.

“As a clinician, you should know that Covid-19 outpatient disease is viral replication, vs hospitalized disease which is florid pneumonia. These are absolutely different conditions and studies of the treatment of one cannot be extrapolated to the treatment of the other.
This massive body of evidence, summarized by the Cochrane Library, demonstrates that well-conducted hydroxychloroquine observational studies on average, produce very similar associations as the corresponding RCTs.

A famous infectious diseases specialist from France, Dr. Didier Raoult, devised treatments for the bacterial infections that cause Q fever and Whipple’s disease. If all that weren’t enough, hydroxychloroquine has anti-thrombotic properties, meaning it reduces blood clotting for patients suffering excessive clotting. It even inhibits autophagy (cellular self-destruction) setting up hydroxychloroquine for research as a unique cancer medication. No other medicine discovered, isolated, or engineered does all of these things. Most importantly during the recent pandemic, hydroxychloroquine, like quinine, also demonstrates antiviral activity. In short, hydroxychloroquine is a gift from nature—one of the most broadly effective and repurposed drugs in the history of medicine. Billions of doses of hydroxychloroquine are distributed annually, and the WHO includes it in its list of essential medicines.

In short, Newsweek and the other “fact-checkers” are attempting to arbitrate scientific truth based on their hatred for Donald Trump. These are journalists, not scientists. They have no business misleading the public on the scientific debate over hydroxychloroquine being a preventative treatment for COVID-19.

The UK has had the ignominious triumph of having one of the world’s highest death rates. Some see the solution in continuing lockdowns, more testing and ultimately the vaccine. We argue that the solution lies in medical treatments, such as hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin rather than in vaccination. But hydroxychloroquine was ruled out as a potential treatment for covid19 quite early on. This is despite the fact that, when used correctly, it is a highly efficacious treatment. Had it been readily available as a prophylactic or early stage treatment we would need neither lockdowns nor vaccinations and dramatically fewer people would have died. However this didn’t happen. Here we intend to explore why.

This is the story of how the best allopathic therapy for COVID-19 was CRUSHED by Bill Gates and the WHO using DEADLY DOSES in order to keep the vaccine narrative and make BILLIONS of dollars.

With a medical establishment seemingly hell-bent on making billions of dollars instead of providing a viable, effective, low-cost pre-hospital treatment, Dr. Zelenko suffered the fate so many have experience since Nov. 4 of 2020. The life-saving information he shared on Twitter was cut off because they terminated his account without warning.

The Recovery study therefore has no interest and does not allow us to deduce anything concerning the effect of hydroxychloroquine on COVID-19. This study most certainly killed patients.

With such a rate of contamination, we are faced with a scenario of collective quasi-immunity managed with a broad prescription of early and prophylactic treatment based on hydroxychloroquine. With a contamination rate of 56%, mortality is 549 people per million inhabitants. Last December, the Institut Pasteur estimated the rate of the French population to be contaminated at 11.3% [1]. Mortality in France is 1200 [2] people per million inhabitants. The population of Delhi is five times more contaminated with mortality more than two times lower compared to France. The case fatality rate with early treatment in Delhi, which is 0.1%, is close to the rate estimated by Professor Raoult in the case of early treatment.

Anyone under the age of 45 with no medical problems has a 99.998% chance of recovery from Covid-19 without intervention with minor symptoms. Question – is there any point in vaccinating this age group? Will it stop the spread? Dr Zelenko observes that “medical textbooks have certain criteria for ‘what’s considered a vaccine'”.
“What we’re talking about with the Moderna and the Pfizer, is experimental gene therapy that hasn’t been approved. It only has an ‘Emergency Use Authorisation’ for experimental gene therapy.”

Dr Zelenko wryly observed that in Australia, Professor Borody knew that the Zelenko treatment ‘won’t fly’ and offered up an alternative solution: ivermectin, doxycycline and zinc.
The reason it ‘won’t fly’? Politics. The streets of the earth are quite literally saturated with the blood of the innocent, due to political interference in medical treatment.

The British Recovery study testing HCQ in patients with COVID-19 used very high doses of hydroxychloroquine, doses that we can qualify as dangerously toxic.

The dose used in the RECOVERY trial, arouses concern because it may have been a disease-aggravating factor negating the therapeutic effect.

I am specifically referring to hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. These drugs (along with zinc), which are as safe as any medicines humanity has taken in the last half-century, should have been almost universally used to treat COVID-19 patients as soon as those patients showed symptoms or tested positive — and even as a prophylactic to prevent or minimize the effects of the illness in the first place. If they had been, it is likely that tens, maybe hundreds, of thousands of those who died of the virus would have lived. Given how safe hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin are, what could we have possibly lost by allowing millions of people to take these medicines?

Wouldn’t it make sense to give our most vulnerable population, where we have seventy percent of the deaths, preventative medication, like hydroxychloroquine

The Marseille professor explained himself in an interview with Figaro Magazine on the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine, conflicts of interest in the scientific community, and the decision taken by Emmanuel Macron not to reconfine.

Source: ABC Radio In an interview with the ABC’s ‘On Drive with Paul Turton’, Professor Clancy explains his conclusions from the many studies available. Robert …

We tested the hypothesis that aerosolized HCQ sulfate (aHCQ) tolerably, safely, and rapidly achieves high respiratory tissue concentrations, while minimizing systemic toxicity.