Source: The Epoch Times

Facebook has suspended the account of Liberal Member of Parliament (MP) Craig Kelly for a week after he allegedly violated their “misinformation and harm policy” by sharing information on hydroxychloroquine.

The MP revealed yesterday that the social media giant deleted five of his posts, which featured medical experts’ supports of alternative CCP virus treatments, hydroxychloroquine, and ivermectin. Facebook also removed a post in which Kelly shared an opinion from a pathologist that “paper and fabric masks are simply virtue signalling.”

The outspoken member for Hughes has faced strong criticism from media and political opponents for sharing information on the anti-malarial drug.

He told The Australian that the ban was a “dark day for freedom of speech,” but added that it would not stop him from voicing support of early treatment drug options.

“I hope this (Facebook) ban is temporary. They went through thousands of my posts and only found five that led to the ban,” Kelly said. “I support the government message on vaccinations. I am advocating for treatments in concert with the vaccine.”

“Three of the posts that were banned weren’t even my opinions. They were quotes from highly credentialed scientists. You might not agree with them, but the public has a right to know about these scientists’ views, and people can rebut them,” he said.

A pharmacist displaying a box of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) tablets in his store in Hyderabad on April 28, 2020. (Noah Seelam/AFP via Getty Images)

Prime Minister Scott Morrison privately reprimanded Kelly after he clashed with Labor MP Tanya Plibersek last week over alternative vaccine treatments.

Briefly after the meeting, Kelly issued a statement saying he “agreed to support” the government’s $6 billion vaccination campaign.

Kelly told The Guardian yesterday that “whether [the views are] right or wrong is a matter of debate, but their views should be debated.”

“I have great concerns about censorship—community standards should not stop us from listening to opinions of highly experienced medical professionals,” he said.

According to The Australian, a Facebook spokesman said the tech giant would crack down on any COVID information that deemed false.

In a blog post on Feb. 8, the company said they would remove “false claims” about COVID-19 and vaccines, as well as censor groups, pages, and accounts on Facebook and Instagram that shared them.

Over 30 claims were listed in Facebook’s new COVID-19 and Vaccine policy as a violation of the community standards, including claims that COVID-19 was man-made in a lab; that vaccines are not effective, toxic, dangerous, or cause autism; or that “something other than a COVID-19 vaccine can vaccinate you against COVID-19.”

“That’s why we work with over 60 fact-checking organizations that review and rate content in more than 50 languages around the world,” the social media giant stated.

According to a report by The Guardian, Labor Party frontbencher Mark Butler wrote to Facebook that he backed their decision to continue monitoring Kelly’s social content.

“The Australian government is currently spending $24 million on an advertising campaign for the vaccine rollout, and Craig Kelly’s Facebook posts are getting four times more engagement than the Australian Department of Health,” Butler said.

Banning the outspoken MP is one latest efforts by a tech giant to control content on its platform.

Australian tech entrepreneur and “Shark Tank” TV series star Steve Baxter condemned Big Tech companies for cancelling dissenting views, including banning social media app Parler and U.S. President Donald Trump’s Twitter account. He warned that censorship was a slippery slope.

“Every last part of it feels wrong,” he told The Epoch Times. “We’ve been saying it for a while, this is an encroaching sort of tyranny. First, in liberal academics, then into people’s lives, and now with COVID-19 restrictions …”

“The next big controversy is when other supposed ‘safe forms’ of media start getting cancelled. The people who are celebrating now will realise how bad the mob is,” he said. “The mob always eats itself. It goes without a shadow of a doubt.”

“What’s the cost of censorship, compared to the cost of things that you don’t want to be said? The cost of censorship is always worse than the annoying words you’re free to ignore,” Baxter said.

Daniel Y. Teng contributed to this article.

Related: Journal of Medicine Says HCQ + Zinc Reduces COVID Deaths

HCQ Peer-reviewed: Pathophysiological Basis and Rationale for Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection

HCQ and Ivermectin included in multifaceted highly targeted sequential multidrug treatment of early ambulatory high-risk COVID-19

‘I base my comments on science’: Emeritus professor Robert Clancy defends hydroxychloroquine stance

Craig Kelly MP, Dr Vladmir Zelenko and early treatment: ‘You don’t have to fall victim to your government’s tyranny’

Dr Vladimir Zelenko and Craig Kelly MP: Who do you put your trust in?

Dr Vladimir Zelenko and Craig Kelly MP: Politics is a blood sport

Dr Vladimir Zelenko and Craig Kelly MP: Stop the fear mongering

Dr Vladimir Zelenko and Craig Kelly MP: Doing the right thing is not always the easiest thing: saving lives with hydroxychloroquine

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on whatsapp
On Trend

Latest Stories

Dr. Harvey Risch: Hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin, and Other Therapeutics Highly Effective in Early COVID Treatment

I’ve railed against this in the media that we are a part of, and the way that the propaganda reacts to this is, “Ignore it. Ignore all of this.” I’m saying this now because the general public has to be the one that gets angry. The general public should be furious at the way people have been treated in the country by suppression of these drugs, by that kind of website that suppresses the ability of doctors to practice medicine.

Read More »

A Judge Stands up to a Hospital: “Step Aside” and Give a Dying Man Ivermectin

The judge’s finest moment may have been when he dashed the most glaring myth about ivermectin—that it is not safe, despite decades of use that shows otherwise. Noting that all drugs have side effects, Judge Fullerton listed ivermectin’s effects from a government website.
“(N)umber one, generally well tolerated; number two, dizziness; number three, pruritus; number four, nausea/diarrhea. These are the side effects for the dosage that’s being asked to be administered,” he said. “The risks of these side effects are so minimal that Mr. Ng’s current situation outweighs that risk by one-hundredfold.”

Read More »