Source: Herald Sun Author: Anthony Piovesan

Senior doctors across Melbourne are calling on the nation’s COVID-19 task force to consider the use of the drugs hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin as a cure against coronavirus.

Some of the city’s top general practitioners, urologists, psychiatrists, and surgeons in the group known as the COVID-19 Medical Network said the drugs could cure coronavirus when taken in its early stages.

GP Dr. Mark Hobart said he prescribed ivermectin to a 94-year-old woman in a nursing home who “responded very well” last year.

“This drug works early on before the virus gets into the lungs,” he said.

“I’ve taken it myself when I was treating elderly patients at a nursing home last year and there were dozens of infections, I never got coronavirus. “I’ve written numerous prescriptions for people who want to have it on hand — you’ve got nothing to lose with this drug, it’s very safe.

“We’re coming up to another cold and flu season and if it’s given to people in nursing homes before an outbreak it’ll cover them.”

Australia’s COVID-19 task force recommended against the use of the widely-used anti-parasitic drug ivermectin as treatment outside of trials, and had no recommendation for its use in prevention.

Hydroxychloroquine is used in Australia to treat arthritis, with the task force also discouraging its use against COVID-19 unless the patient was enrolled in a clinical trial.

But anaesthetist Dr Eamonn Mathieson — who practises in Melbourne’s north — is urging the task force to reconsider.

“The evidence in favour of the efficacy and safety of the treatment options for the management of the early phase of COVID-19 illness is now considered by many Australian and international medical experts, including the esteemed professor Robert Clancy, to be virtually beyond dispute,” he said.

“It could be argued that this death toll may have been significantly reduced if early treatment options and protocols were made available and were not blocked or banned.”

Dr. Mathieson cited studies from overseas and said countries that used hydroxychloroquine against coronavirus had “dramatically lower” death tolls than other countries that didn’t use the drug.

Coalition MP Craig Kelly put his political career on the line and spoke out about the two drugs and his attempts to lobby health officials to consider them as treatments against coronavirus.

Related: Emeritus Professor Robert Clancy responds to MP Craig Kelly’s hydroxychloroquine & ivermectin comments: Liam Bartlet‪t‬ interview

Peer-Reviewed Journal Reports Hydroxychloroquine Can Reduce Mortality Rates In COVID-19 Patients

HCQ and Ivermectin included in multifaceted highly targeted sequential multidrug treatment of early ambulatory high-risk COVID-19

Ivermectin for Covid-19: Database of all Ivermectin COVID-19 studies – 35 trials and growing

COVID-19: A realistic approach to community management – HCQ & IVM in concert with vaccination

Not Using Ivermectin, One Year In, Is Unethical And Immoral

The results of a meta-analysis of 187 studies treating COVID-19 successfully with hydroxychloroquine are statistically irrefutable.

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on whatsapp
On Trend

Latest Stories

American Hero: Ralph C. Lorigo Fights for Client Rights Including Access to Ivermectin for COVID-19 Patients At Risk

Lorigo shared with TrialSite that once doctors learn of all of the studies around the world, and start doing their own homework, they become more open-minded, factoring in the risk-reward analysis. Especially if elderly high risk patients present advanced COVID-19, Lorigo has personally seen the drug potentially contribute to saving the lives of clients. Interestingly, the attorney reports that it would appear that hospital administrations are the most recalcitrant to the idea, even if the patients and the ICU doctor are in support.

Read More »

The Chloroquine Wars Part XIV – How to Rig Research: Surgisphere Part I

It was in these very moments in late May when public health officials lost all credibility—a credibility that cannot be restored without major changes taking place. Despite most evidence pointing to a likelihood of HCQ efficacy, they made their call on the back of data supposedly tucked away in a database that nobody had verified, declared it definitive, then swiftly pushed for policy changes around the world.

Read More »