Source: Rounding the Earth Author: Mathew Crawford

When you become wise of the healer, also become wise of the sickness.” -South African proverb

South Africa is a nation in long transition on the journey of self-governance since the Apartheid era. Of the large nations of Africa, South Africa has been hit hardest by the pandemic, though its ups and downs tells one of the most revealing stories of COVID-19 pandemonium.

South Africa’s Use of Medicine During the Pandemic

In late March, 2020, South Africa banned the export of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in order to ensure its own supply as much of the world looked to the drug as the first line of defense against COVID-19.

However, the exact degree to which South Africans have used the drug is hard to ascertain. By policy, South Africa allows that decision to be private between a doctor and patient. Though exact levels of usage of HCQ cannot be ascertained, we know that South Africa was one of the first recipients of HCQ from India after India lifted its own export ban in April, 2020.

And we can count South Africa as one of the nations that followed China’s advice of use of the zinc ionophore.


South Africa did sign up for both the WHO’s Solidarity HCQ treatment trial and also a multi-national PrEP trial, the latter of which is ongoing. Some hospitals have reported the choice not to treat COVID-19 patients using HCQ, but do allow independent practitioners working out of those hospitals to make their own decisions.

On August 5, 2020, South African officials published a recommendation against the use of HCQ and some other medications that were surely less available or used. Corticosteroids were recommended in use for patients on supplemental oxygen or on mechanical ventilation. Since that date, COVID-19 fatalities in South Africa have been around 2.25 times as high per day as prior while the worldwide growth rate of COVID-19 mortality has remained very steady.

The case fatality rate in South Africa is around twice as high since the cessation of its use of HCQ as compared to prior.


South Africa’s Vaccination Campaign

South Africa began its vaccination program at the tail end of its second major SARS-CoV-2 outbreak, on February 17, 2021, employing the Pfizer, CoronaVac, Johnson & Johnson, and AstraZeneca vaccines. South Africa’s CFR, which was 3.00% at the time, jumped to 10.57% over the next 36 days.


This jump is consistent with rises in CFR while vaccinating elderly populations around Europe. Nearly twice as many South Africans died during its third COVID-19 wave as during its second, which is unusual for a viral outbreak where the second wave is nearly always the highest. It is also inconsistent with the global pattern during the COVID-19 pandemic, as we see in the first chart.

South Africa’s excess mortality trends may shed further light on the efficacy of various interventions. Upon publicly announcing its intentions to secure an HCQ supply, overall excess deaths trended negative, as is often the case following a surge as most surges in excess mortality take place among the most frail who would otherwise make up a substantial portion of those who might have died in upcoming weeks or months. However, excess deaths did not revert particularly sharply after cessation of HCQ usage or upon introduction of vaccines. Each gave way to new waves of mortality.


Corruption among medical officials appears to be a problem in South Africa. On September 29, 2021, the Associated Press reported that former health minister Dr. Zweli Mkhize, who resigned a month earlier in August, steered a $10M “COVID-19 communications” contract to associates who kicked part of the contract back to Mkhize’s family members. This is just a piece of the $900M in suspect contracts in a nation long noted for corruption in the public health sector and provincial health departments (Rispel et al, 2015), that hasn’t found the will to solve the problem. It is enough to make any reasonable person question the purpose of so many billions of dollars in COVID-19 aid to Africa (emphasis theirs):

In Africa, the World Bank’s response is focused around four main areas, simultaneously: saving lives, protecting poor people, protecting and creating jobs, and building back better.

The Early Treatment of Delta: Part 2 – Dr Shankara Chetty

Far-Reaching Interview with Nick Hudson from Pandemics Data & Analytics (PANDA)

Interview with Zimbabwe’s Dr. Jackie Stone: COVID-19 Infection & DEATH RATES PLUMMET Post MCAZ green light for Ivermectin Use


The lawyer who won the Ivermectin battle for South Africans

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on whatsapp
On Trend

Latest Stories

Dr. Harvey Risch: Hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin, and Other Therapeutics Highly Effective in Early COVID Treatment

I’ve railed against this in the media that we are a part of, and the way that the propaganda reacts to this is, “Ignore it. Ignore all of this.” I’m saying this now because the general public has to be the one that gets angry. The general public should be furious at the way people have been treated in the country by suppression of these drugs, by that kind of website that suppresses the ability of doctors to practice medicine.

Read More »

A Judge Stands up to a Hospital: “Step Aside” and Give a Dying Man Ivermectin

The judge’s finest moment may have been when he dashed the most glaring myth about ivermectin—that it is not safe, despite decades of use that shows otherwise. Noting that all drugs have side effects, Judge Fullerton listed ivermectin’s effects from a government website.
“(N)umber one, generally well tolerated; number two, dizziness; number three, pruritus; number four, nausea/diarrhea. These are the side effects for the dosage that’s being asked to be administered,” he said. “The risks of these side effects are so minimal that Mr. Ng’s current situation outweighs that risk by one-hundredfold.”

Read More »