Source: Rounding The Earth Author: Mathew Crawford

Last year the WHO ran a series of trials to test the outcomes of various treatments for COVID-19 patients. At first, they did not plan to test hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in those trials, despite it being at the top of nearly everyone’s list for repurposed drugs with great potential (specifically as an antiviral that demonstrated in vitro efficacy against SARS-CoV-1). When they did finally include HCQ in their trials, they did so in a way that completely skirted the primary HCQ hypothesis in numerous ways:

Instead of providing reasonable answers to these obvious critiques, which would risk creation of a record of dialogue, the WHO moved forward with their charade, even taking out paid ads on Google. Note that the ad misleads the reader by not talking about early treatment, but instead about “deaths among hospitalized patients”, and in a way that is vague about whether this is an assessment from a single data pool, or a summary data pool. The phrase “myth busters” gets thrown in, which I’m sure excites the motor neurons of Western geeks who enjoy watching people do science more than actually doing it.

Since I’ve seen this ad several dozen times, I assume it received hundreds of millions if not billions or impressions over the past year. While largely subliminal, it is likely they have an impact.

Fast forward a few months since the WHO “we’ll test the least effective way to use this drug and call it a day” trials, we’re seeing this form of propaganda again, and at a time when India’s uptick in cases is firmly in the spotlight. With deaths on the rise, more states in India, such as Goa, started giving ivermectin to patients with what appear to be excellent results.

blank

Taken in conjunction with similar outcomes in other Indian states, not to mention other nations and evidence, ivermectin has started to look like the treatment of choice for many. Perhaps that’s when those whose interests are not served by such a development jump into action? It doesn’t take a clever cat to recognize the pattern…

blank

“Oh, but this is official, like the WHO…”

The best way to hurt people is to capture an organization with built in trust that handles people in communities. That’s how we wind up with priests who abuse childrensummer camps run by cult-like predatorsgovernment departments assigned to help the poor engineering financial boondoggles for bankers, and maybe technocraticMarxist infiltration of the WHO.

Now, GAVI, which stands for…Gates…Vaccine…something-or-other…it’s “the vaccine alliance”, which is all friendly and cuddly sounding…is running ads to convince people that all this evidence of ivermectin’s efficacy in treating COVID-19 is meaningless, or at least “not recommended” (by WHOm?).

blank

This is pulled straight from the same playbook as the propaganda against HCQ. Even if you’re not sure that one or both of these medicines is effective despite uniformly positive results when applied as early treatment, you should at least recognize the pattern, scratch your head, and question whether there is…maybe…just possibly some perverse incentive like power or profit from vaccines driving this absurdity.







Related:

The Chloroquine Wars Part X – A Discussion of the Insanity of the Chloroquine Wars

The Chloroquine Wars Part XI – See No Good, Hear No Good, Speak No Good

The Chloroquine Wars Part XII – Manufactured Fear During Hydroxychloroquine’s Trump Moment

The Chloroquine Wars Part XIII -A Clockwork Orange Man

The Chloroquine Wars Part XIV – How to Rig Research: Surgisphere Part I

The Chloroquine Wars Part XVII – Why the Story About India’s April COVID-19 Spike is All Wrong

The Chloroquine Wars Part XV – How to Rig Research: Surgisphere Part II

The Chloroquine Wars Part XIX – Historical Failures of Public Health Authorities

The Chloroquine Wars Part XX – Why The Early Treatment Data is Better Than Anyone Imagines

The Chloroquine Wars Part XXI

Doctor Didier Raoult Part I: Where We Are Now -The Chloroquine Wars Part XXV

Everything Bret Weinstein, Heather Heying, and Pierre Kory Missed About “The Crime of the Century” The Chloroquine Wars Part XXVI

Journal Editors Resign Over Suppression of Ivermectin Research Paper – The Chloroquine Wars Part XXVII

What if the SARS-CoV-2 Virus is Weaker Than Most Everyone Thinks? – The Chloroquine Wars Part XXVIII

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on whatsapp
On Trend

Latest Stories

Stark madness to ban ivermectin

Buried in the note is the real reason for making ivermectin inaccessible – the fear that persons taking it ‘may elect not to be vaccinated as part of the national Covid-19 vaccination program’. This is outrageous. When someone is infected with Covid, it is too late to bother with vaccination. They need early treatment. To deny it to coerce them into accepting a vaccine, one of whose side-effects is death, is immoral.

Read More »

Australia’s TGA Bans GPs from Prescribing Ivermectin

Australia’s medicine and therapeutic regulatory, the Therapeutic Good Administration (TGA) recently took the gloves off with Ivermectin, the economical anti-parasitic drug associated with at least 63 completed clinical trials involving SARS-CoV-2, the virus behind COVID-19. Now TGA formally places a national prohibition on off-label prescribing of ivermectin to all general practitioners. A comparable move as to what TGA did with hydroxychloroquine in 2020. Clearly further evidence of tightening encroachment of the critically important doctor-patient treatment relationship allowing consent to medical treatment using off-label medications. Of course, this isn’t occurring in a vacuum—it’s part of an unfolding, integrated and what have the signs of a coordinated and orchestrated government action to stop any and all treatments other than those the government declares acceptable.

Read More »