Source: America’s Frontline Doctors Speaker: Dr Richard Urso


Dr Richard Urso uncovers a tiny but enormously significant detail in a chloroquine study – listen carefully…

‘So we corresponded with the author, and I said, I am so happy for your study. You just showed one of the most amazing things that I’ve ever seen. I never thought I would see something so clear. You just proved that when viruses are around when chloroquine is around, chloroquine will let the virus attack a cancer cell. Think about that. So it will protect a normal cell.

‘But chloroquine will not protect a cancer cell because they differentiate. The receptors are different. I mean, think about that. I mean, think about that. So I tore them back. I said, thank you. You completely misinterpreted the data, and you hid the fact, they hid it. They put it all the way down. As you know, you have to look for the data set.

‘So I found it in the appendix in little letters. Kalu three lung cells. This is the disinformation campaign that we are faced with. They put out a big thing and they said, ‘Oh, it doesn’t work.’ They put it on Medical Express. ‘That’s it for chloroquine. It’s unlikely to work against SARS CoV two. We just proved it.’

No, you proved chloroquine is one of the smartest drugs in history. It will let viruses attack cancer cells, but not normal cells.

Related: How hydroxychloroquine works at the cellular level

Covid-19, Early Treatment, and America’s Frontline Doctors – The Dr Urso Interview

How much proof do you want? Hundreds of studies conclude – treat Covid-19 early with hydroxychloroquine!

Nebulized Hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 Treatment: 80x Improvement in Breathing – Dr Vladimir Zelenko

Turkey studies the impact of hydroxychloroquine-azithromycin combination – No significant heart QT prolongation found

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on whatsapp
On Trend

Latest Stories

Dr. Harvey Risch: Hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin, and Other Therapeutics Highly Effective in Early COVID Treatment

I’ve railed against this in the media that we are a part of, and the way that the propaganda reacts to this is, “Ignore it. Ignore all of this.” I’m saying this now because the general public has to be the one that gets angry. The general public should be furious at the way people have been treated in the country by suppression of these drugs, by that kind of website that suppresses the ability of doctors to practice medicine.

Read More »

A Judge Stands up to a Hospital: “Step Aside” and Give a Dying Man Ivermectin

The judge’s finest moment may have been when he dashed the most glaring myth about ivermectin—that it is not safe, despite decades of use that shows otherwise. Noting that all drugs have side effects, Judge Fullerton listed ivermectin’s effects from a government website.
“(N)umber one, generally well tolerated; number two, dizziness; number three, pruritus; number four, nausea/diarrhea. These are the side effects for the dosage that’s being asked to be administered,” he said. “The risks of these side effects are so minimal that Mr. Ng’s current situation outweighs that risk by one-hundredfold.”

Read More »