Source: Rounding The Earth Author: Mathew Crawford

Early on during the pandemic, Professor Paolo Zanotto (Virologist and Microbiologist)  was among those encouraging the use of Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) after observing results from numerous nations around the world. He believes that the use of HCQ, along with azithromycin and zinc, for those sick with COVID-19 (as early therapy during the first five days, in particular) reduces risks of suffering and death. More recently, Zanotto warned against mass vaccination, offering an opinion that age and risk stratification makes better policy sense. Having completed his doctorate at the Institute in Virology and Biochemistry at Oxford University in 1995, Zanotto stands out as a rock at the University of Sao Paulo in Brazil, working with post-doctoral researchers from a variety of nations.

Understand that Zanotto is not generally an “anti-vaxxer”. He maintains a two-decades-long association with the Institute Pasteur (Senegal/Paris) and helped organize the Brazilian response to the Zika virus in 2016, training many scientists along the way to co-developing three vaccine platforms along with researchers at Harvard University. The journals NatureScience, and the New England Journal of Medicine published his work on Zika, including his team’s discovery of the link between Zika and microcephaly.

More recently, the Dean, managers, and administrators at the USP have held a “monkey trial” accusing Prof. Zanotto of “lack of scientific rigor”, with the goal of unseating him from his post.

Whether you agree with him on any one point or not, holding a set of opinions different from those of vaccine manufacturers or the World Health Organization (WHO) is what we expect of academia where science is generally shielded from political influence that sometimes drives artificial consensus. That shield seems to be fading fast these days. It is one thing to get blasted by anonymous trolls on reddit. Nobody likes that, but grownups know that some negative attention comes with defending a controversial opinion. Having your position, vocation, and research threatened is a far more serious matter.

On 7/8/2021 7:44 AM, Paolo Marinho De Andrade Zanotto wrote:

Dear colleagues,

I am undergoing a brutal cancelation and moral assassination attempt at my university for defending early treatment. I would need your urgent manifestation and help, possibly by sending letters to the effect that early treatment is being effective and that denying it today is causing death and suffering.

Letters of support to my effort to the Direction of my Institute (Biomedical Institute at University of São Paulo) to the following e-mail addresses:  dir@icb.usp.br and

comunicacao@icb.usp.br

Moreover, if possible, I would like to ask you to manifest also at:

https://www.facebook.com/icb.usp/photos/a.326305550775433/5602431056496163/

It is important that manifestations are sent before July 13th, at 9 AM (our time) when they will bring me to the Gallows.

All the best,

Prof. Paolo Zanotto, D. Phil.

LEMB – ICB – USP

If you believe, as I do, that academic freedom is important to maintaining integrity in science, you can share your concerns. Write to Zanotto’s university and condemn the attempt to remove him from his position. 

You can also sign this Change.org petition set up by journalist Filipe Rafaeli.







Brazilian virologist Professor Paolo Zanotto from the University of Sao Paulo describes early hydroxychloroquine protocol success

Brazil, Prof. Paola Zanotto: Hydroxychloroquine given early is the medicine to beat the epidemic

50 Science References Supporting Hydroxychloroquine: Microbiology Professor at Universidade de São Paulo, Paola Zanotto

Brazilian scientists and academics write an open letter on the ‘science’ of the coronavirus pandemic

Dr. Brian Tyson, USA: Hydroxychloroquine – Data, Strategies and Success Treating over 6000 Covid Patients

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on whatsapp
On Trend

Latest Stories

Trouble in Paradise Surrounding the use of Ivermectin

In nations around the world tension mounts between physicians and caregivers seeking to prescribe what they professionally deem as safe doses of ivermectin, as an off-label treatment for COVID-19 and national health authorities, which for the most part have all taken a hostile and oppositional position against the use of the drug.

Read More »

How Ivermectin became a Target for the ‘Fraud Detectives.’

And why is ivermectin being so negatively targeted by Big Tech and Big Media? One could argue conflict of interest plays a major role, given how intertwined they are with Big Pharma and the far-reaching grasp of the BMGF. A cheap and effective early treatment for Covid-19, like ivermectin, can be seen as a significant threat to the financial interests of those involved with Covid vaccines and expensive anti-viral drugs.

Read More »

Canada: Alberta Failing on COVID-19 Vaccines and Treatment

Numerous studies and clinical observation of thousands of patients has indicated that Ivermectin is highly effective in this regard. Even low dose studies that were designed to reach the conclusion that ivermectin was not effective found a signal that indicated that Ivermectin effectively interacted with the COVID virus molecule to prevent or lessen replication of the virus.”

Read More »