I am undergoing a brutal cancelation and moral assassination attempt at my university for defending early treatment. Early treatment is effective and denying it today is causing death and suffering.
Dr. Vladimir Zelenko talks with author John Leake about treating his patients for Covid-19 and then sharing his insight with the White House. In spite of (or because of) President Trump’s initial embrace of Dr. Zelenko’s treatment protocol, government agencies such as the NIH and FDA first dismissed it, and then prevented public access to its key ingredient, hydroxychloroquine. This deliberate suppression of a life saving medication led to the preventable deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans.
The data from the vaccine trials must be recalculated under the lens that some of the serious adverse events (SAEs) should be treated as COVID-19 cases.
There may not be any vaccine efficacy in the data at all if some of the post-vaccination deaths are due to vaccine-induced COVID-19. It could even be the case that the mortality efficacy goes negative. My implied lives saved calculations put this easily in the realm of possibility. The only way to know is for authorities to organize and compile the data. And while a risk analysis is certainly due after more than six months of hundreds of millions of doses delivered, there is little indication authorities have bothered with the process. That’s more than a bit unsettling.
We continue to delve extensively into the COVID-19 data with esteemed statistician, Mathew Crawford. In this episode, we take a closer look at the use of early treatment and its success. Mathew has been researching the data from Dr. Brian Tyson, who has successfully treated over 6000 patients who contracted COVID throughout the pandemic. It is my great honor to have Dr. Tyson here on this episode to not only discuss the data, but also the strategies that he has been using throughout the pandemic.
The Roman/Hernandez meta-analysis comes at a politically contentious moment. Their language and behavior appear political. Their work is error-laden, takes research out of its true context, uses numbers that don’t seem to come from the actual studies, chooses papers testing ivermectin under the least favorable circumstances, gives unexplained and inappropriate weights to the small amount of data that stands as outliers to the bigger picture, and still drives a conclusion of “don’t use this” from a massive average mortality reduction that did not quite reach statistical significance. At the same time the authors consistently complain about the “low quality of evidence” represented by the studies they do and do not include, nearly all of which I would describe as produced by higher quality scientists who can at least tally numbers correctly.
Those who design the trials and control the data also control the outcome. So this system of industry-led trials needs to be put to an end.
The death rate from COVID-19 is dramatically low at United Memorial Medical Center in Houston, TX compared to other hospitals across the nation and the world. Despite Dr. Joseph Varon’s popularity on TV, news personalities avoid questions of why he’s having success treating his patients. As it turns out, he’s using drugs the WHO and CDC recommend against.
Dr. Risch gives a succinct history of the politics of hydroxychloroquine and other useful existing medicines in the USA, which has had global effect, as many countries look to the USA for guidance. Corruption and manipulation from behind the scenes around the world are brought to the surface for scrutiny.
The results not only provide a structural basis for the anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity of HCQ, but also renders HCQ to be the first known drug capable of targeting LLPS.
Reporter Ivory Hecker says reporting on hydroxychloroquine was censored at her station, the local Fox affiliate in Houston.
The SOLIDARITY and RECOVERY protocols look prima facie like staged sabotage.I drew a picture to make the point: The WHO could not have plausibly chosen a less optimal treatment protocol.
Source: Rounding The Earth Author: Mathew Crawford Fifty years ago today, the New York Times began publication of the Pentagon Papers, informing the public about how a government-engineered
“For science to work, you have to have an open exchange of ideas,” Bhattacharya said of the censorship. “If you’re going to make an argument that something is misinformation, you should provide an actual argument. You can’t just take it down and say, ‘Oh, it’s misinformation’ without actually giving a reason.
In absolute honesty, I don’t think vaccines are even necessary. Why are they not necessary? Well that’s because there are at least four or five safe and effective medicines and their presence has been suppressed and hidden from the public, so they’re not really necessary.
During the first wave, the primary antiviral used was HCQ, and during the second wave (after Facebook censored his account where he was communicating with others in a large nation) they shifted to ivermectin due to HCQ controversies. Similarly to the way Dr. Brian Tyson attacked COVID-19 with an early multi-drug regimen, numerous other medicines, including aspirin, were used. Of Dr. Shah’s 8,000 or so patients, only 5 succumbed to COVID-19. This is notably similar to the results of Dr. Didier Raoult.
“We found that when the cumulative doses of two drugs, HCQ and AZM, were above a certain level, patients had a survival rate 2.9 times the other patients,” the authors of the study noted.
This is pulled straight from the same playbook as the propaganda against HCQ. Even if you’re not sure that one or both of these medicines is effective despite uniformly positive results when applied as early treatment, you should at least recognize the pattern, scratch your head, and question whether there is…maybe…just possibly some perverse incentive like power or profit from vaccines driving this absurdity.
Source: India Today Author: Prabhash K Dutta Hydroxychloroquine, the malaria drug touted as a magical Covid-19 cure by former US President Donald Trump last year,
There are so many ways to attack this virus, so we’ll move forward with an argument that SARS-CoV-2 is far easier to handle than its public image suggests.
In a new study, Smith and three other medical experts prove what he and this show have been telling you for more than a year that hydroxychloroquine can save lives. Smith’s landmark study followed 255 COVID patients who required intubation during the first two months of the pandemic, and it found that increased doses of coadministered, hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin were associated with a greater than 100% increase in survival.
Over 10,000 patients,a fatality rate more than 97% LOWER than France’s – an exceptional case for early treatment with a drug regimen including HCQ & AZM.
Most Covid studies have not considered days of therapy, cumulative dose, or weight-adjusted dosing. We found that when the cumulative doses of two drugs, HCQ and AZM, were above a certain level, patients had a survival rate 2.9 times the other patients. By using causal analysis and considering of weight-adjusted cumulative dose, we prove the combined therapy, >3 g HCQ and > 1g AZM greatly increases survival in Covid patients on IMV and that HCQ cumulative dose > 80 mg/kg works substantially better. These data do not yet apply to hospitalized patients not on IMV. Since those with higher doses of HCQ had higher doses of AZM, we cannot solely attribute the causal effect to HCQ/AZM combination therapy. However, it is likely AZM does contribute significantly to this increase in survival rate. Since higher dose HCQ/AZM therapy improves survival by nearly 200% in this population, the safety data are moot. However, given the data presented here, the studies reporting HCQ’s effect of QTc intervals need to be re-evaluated.
McCullough walks through a thorough (if basic) coverage of many drugs and nutraceuticals that have been effectively used around the world—the best single such coverage seen packed into one video.
“Tackling the pandemic probably requires, in addition to a vaccine, a preventive or early-acting drug. This drug also helps especially in a situation where vaccine coverage threatens to remain too low for herd immunity,” said Väänänen.
A medical doctor and scientist, Dr Urso is one of the most prominent C19 doctors in the US. Since March 2020, he has treated hundreds of patients at home, on an ambulatory basis. In this interview, he tells us about his experience, about C19 in Texas and about the America’s Frontline Doctors movement.
Dr Richard Urso uncovers a hugely significant detail in a chloroquine study. Chloroquine will protect a normal cell & let the virus attack a cancer cell.
Doctors have found safe, effective and inexpensive treatments that work well in preventing and treating patients with COVID-19 like Ivermectin that’s been used safely for more than 30 years.
But the government has not supported the use of this effective drug. In fact, there are other therapies like hydroxychloroquine, vitamins D and C and zinc that physicians have found to be safe and effective in preventing and treating COVID.
Dr. Pierre Kory explain both the case that ivermectin (IVM) effectively prevents or treats COVID-19, and also how and why that information is withheld by public health officials.
But while political psychology did its thing, making HCQ a no go zone for many physicians, Tyson and his staff simply treated patients according to whatever seemed to work, using HCQ as a primary option. And work it did.
Today, the health experts tasked at the political levels of the United States (and by chance those nations closest to its sphere of influence) are failing us by dismissing an avalanche of evidence of effective empiric COVID-19 treatments, primarily at the early stages of disease.
Source: Francesoir Italy has been talked about a lot since the start of the Covid crisis in 2020 with first of all a significant mortality
We are very honored to present this interview of Dr Vladimir Zelenko, the father of outpatient treatment for COVID-19 in North America. Dr Zelenko shares his own experience with COVID-19 as a patient, as he is recovering from a severe form of the disease.
He also talks about his cancer and how he was able to go through this dramatic episode of his life. Then, he presents his perspectives about outpatient treatment as practiced today and the evolution of the pandemic, among other topics.
Significant QT prolongation was not observed during the follow‐up period compared with the baseline values in the present study. No ventricular arrhythmias, second and third‐degree heart blocks, or severe pauses were recorded during the treatment period.
“The Minister of Health, Marcelo Queiroga, has announced that he will soon launch a protocol of drugs to be used in the treatment against Covid-19. ”
This guide, which should guide health workers, has, as likely drugs, hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin.
Today, most leading doctors in India are themselves not promoting the Ministry of Health guidelines that includes the use of hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin and inhaled budesonide.
Dr. George Fareed interviews a 47-year-old patient who had Covid-19 and co-morbidities. He was at high risk and survived thanks to his early treatment regime. The patient’s treatment protocol included hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, doxycycline, and Vitamin D.
“It [nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize] gives credibility to the message,” Dr. Zelenko said. “Which is, treat Covid-19 early and live.”
Independent Federal MP Craig Kelly has hit back at Facebook after it permanently deleted his official page. “This is the electronic version of book burning where they simply don’t like what I say,” he told Ben Fordham.
So, what’s different between Maharashtra and Delhi with respect to the rest of India and South Asia? Instead of relying on HCQ and IVM, many doctors and health officials in Maharashtra and Delhi pushed the expensive and profitable remdesivir drug. Due to its cost and recommended time of usage, remdesivir is not used either as a prophylaxis or for early outpatient treatment. And unlike the cheap and easy-to-produce HCQ and IVM, remdesivir is difficult to replace when it runs out.
HCQ is effective for COVID-19. The probability that an ineffective treatment generated results as positive as the 235 studies to date is estimated to be 1 in 6 quadrillion (p = 0.00000000000000018).
Early treatment is most successful, with 100% of 29 studies reporting a positive effect (13 statistically significant in isolation) and an estimated reduction of 65% in the effect measured (death, hospitalization, etc.) using a random effects meta-analysis, RR 0.35 [0.25-0.50].
92% of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) for early, PrEP, or PEP treatment report positive effects, the probability of this happening for an ineffective treatment is 0.0017.
