In short, Newsweek and the other “fact-checkers” are attempting to arbitrate scientific truth based on their hatred for Donald Trump. These are journalists, not scientists. They have no business misleading the public on the scientific debate over hydroxychloroquine being a preventative treatment for COVID-19.
Source: Communities Digital News Author: Rick Johnson LOS ANGELES, CA: As the COVID-19 pandemic explodes in the New York region and across California, the Malaria
The UK has had the ignominious triumph of having one of the world’s highest death rates. Some see the solution in continuing lockdowns, more testing and ultimately the vaccine. We argue that the solution lies in medical treatments, such as hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin rather than in vaccination. But hydroxychloroquine was ruled out as a potential treatment for covid19 quite early on. This is despite the fact that, when used correctly, it is a highly efficacious treatment. Had it been readily available as a prophylactic or early stage treatment we would need neither lockdowns nor vaccinations and dramatically fewer people would have died. However this didn’t happen. Here we intend to explore why.
“I have great concerns about censorship—community standards should not stop us from listening to opinions of highly experienced medical professionals.”
This is the story of how the best allopathic therapy for COVID-19 was CRUSHED by Bill Gates and the WHO using DEADLY DOSES in order to keep the vaccine narrative and make BILLIONS of dollars.
“The effect of censoring debate on these early treatments could have possibly been responsible for the death of hundreds of thousands of people.
So, where we should have been having more open debate and more free debate, shutting down debate is likely to have killed people. Not just one or two people, but probably hundreds of thousands. This is why throughout the last 250 years people have said free speech is so important. This is why people have said, ‘I may not agree with what you say but I’ll fight to my death your right to say it.’”
With a medical establishment seemingly hell-bent on making billions of dollars instead of providing a viable, effective, low-cost pre-hospital treatment, Dr. Zelenko suffered the fate so many have experience since Nov. 4 of 2020. The life-saving information he shared on Twitter was cut off because they terminated his account without warning.
An email from Prime Minister Trudeau’s director of policy and cabinet affairs, Rick Theis, to Trudeau’s lead speechwriter, Astrid Krizus, about the ordering of pandemic supplies shows that the writer was suggested to make no mention of the Government of Canada’s purchase of hydroxychloroquine alongside other supplies, when preparing an official statement.
The Recovery study therefore has no interest and does not allow us to deduce anything concerning the effect of hydroxychloroquine on COVID-19. This study most certainly killed patients.
The recourse to the treatment with hydroxychloroquine advocated by Professor Raoult would have made it possible to greatly reduce the number of deaths and to avoid the appalling present situation.
With such a rate of contamination, we are faced with a scenario of collective quasi-immunity managed with a broad prescription of early and prophylactic treatment based on hydroxychloroquine. With a contamination rate of 56%, mortality is 549 people per million inhabitants. Last December, the Institut Pasteur estimated the rate of the French population to be contaminated at 11.3% [1]. Mortality in France is 1200 [2] people per million inhabitants. The population of Delhi is five times more contaminated with mortality more than two times lower compared to France. The case fatality rate with early treatment in Delhi, which is 0.1%, is close to the rate estimated by Professor Raoult in the case of early treatment.
Doing the right thing sometimes comes at a price: abusive attacks, criticism, false accusations, job loss and slander.
Dr Zelenko and MP Craig Kelly share the challenges in finding ways to leave both a positive imprint on the world and a moral legacy that you do what’s right and not what’s easy.
Anyone under the age of 45 with no medical problems has a 99.998% chance of recovery from Covid-19 without intervention with minor symptoms. Question – is there any point in vaccinating this age group? Will it stop the spread? Dr Zelenko observes that “medical textbooks have certain criteria for ‘what’s considered a vaccine'”.
“What we’re talking about with the Moderna and the Pfizer, is experimental gene therapy that hasn’t been approved. It only has an ‘Emergency Use Authorisation’ for experimental gene therapy.”
Knowledge is the power to remove the fear. Prophylaxis and early treatment is absolutely possible. Treatment costs are very cheap, available by mouth and safe. The treament protocol has been replicated dozens of times by world class researchers and they all conclude that there is an 85% reduction in hospitalisation and death IF you treat people early.
Dr Zelenko wryly observed that in Australia, Professor Borody knew that the Zelenko treatment ‘won’t fly’ and offered up an alternative solution: ivermectin, doxycycline and zinc.
The reason it ‘won’t fly’? Politics. The streets of the earth are quite literally saturated with the blood of the innocent, due to political interference in medical treatment.
Mainstream media has dropped the ball terribly as they spin their own one-sided narrative on Covid-19. Life-saving peer-reviewed studies are continually blocked by the media giants. Join MP Craig Kelly and Dr Vladimir Zelenko as they discuss media bias, where that leaves the citizens of the world, and who they should put their trust into.
The British Recovery study testing HCQ in patients with COVID-19 used very high doses of hydroxychloroquine, doses that we can qualify as dangerously toxic.
Early Covid treatment advocates Craig Kelly MP (Federal Member For Hughes, Australia) and Dr Vladimir Zelenko discuss the background behind the development of the ‘Zelenko Protocol’ – a combination of hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin and zinc – for the early treatment of Covid-19.
The dose used in the RECOVERY trial, arouses concern because it may have been a disease-aggravating factor negating the therapeutic effect.
The suggested treatment protocol ideally begins when someone first tests positive for COVID-19. Patients are started on a daily “nutraceutical bundle” of zinc sulfate (220 mg), Vitamin D (5000 IU), Vitamin C (3000 mg), and a flavonoid called quercetin (500 mg), found in several fruits and vegetables, which reduces viral replication. All are available over the counter.
For those 50 years or older with one or more comorbidities, an intravenous infusion of monoclonal antibodies is suggested. In addition, the patient is immediately started on an array of anti-infective agents, which includes hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, azithromycin, doxycycline, and favipiravir. Some patients are started on a steroid like prednisone, and some are given an anticoagulant.
I am specifically referring to hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. These drugs (along with zinc), which are as safe as any medicines humanity has taken in the last half-century, should have been almost universally used to treat COVID-19 patients as soon as those patients showed symptoms or tested positive — and even as a prophylactic to prevent or minimize the effects of the illness in the first place. If they had been, it is likely that tens, maybe hundreds, of thousands of those who died of the virus would have lived. Given how safe hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin are, what could we have possibly lost by allowing millions of people to take these medicines?
“I demand an apology,” wrote Immanuel. “When we said Hydroxychloroquine works we were ridiculed. Now studies are coming out saying it works.”
Wouldn’t it make sense to give our most vulnerable population, where we have seventy percent of the deaths, preventative medication, like hydroxychloroquine
The Ministry of Health identified 5 drugs that can be used to treat Covid19: favipiravir, remdesivir, umifenovir, hydroxychloroquine & interferon-alpha.
The Marseille professor explained himself in an interview with Figaro Magazine on the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine, conflicts of interest in the scientific community, and the decision taken by Emmanuel Macron not to reconfine.
Senior doctors across Melbourne have formed an “alliance” and are urging health officials to consider the use of two drugs which they say can cure coronavirus.
Source: ABC Radio In an interview with the ABC’s ‘On Drive with Paul Turton’, Professor Clancy explains his conclusions from the many studies available. Robert
Source: 6PR Mornings Australian medical bioscientist and clinical immunologist Robert Clancy, an expert in the relationship between infection and the airways, declares “the data is
We tested the hypothesis that aerosolized HCQ sulfate (aHCQ) tolerably, safely, and rapidly achieves high respiratory tissue concentrations, while minimizing systemic toxicity.
HCQ is a zinc ionophore, meaning it shuttles zinc into the cell, and there’s compelling evidence to suggest the primary benefit of the HCQ protocol actually comes from the zinc, which effectively inhibits viral replication.
It’s not just hydroxychloroquine. There are many drugs that can be used, as we have seen this week. … There is a whole new repertoire … of drugs that work in early treatment.
Source:The Epoch Times Author: Roger L. Simon You don’t have to be Emile Zola to say “J’accuse!” I accuse—in no particular order—Time’s ‘Person of the
American Journal of Medicine announces peer-reviewed early outpatient treatment protocol for Covid19 including hydroxychloroquine. Acute COVID-19 has a great range of clinical severity from asymptomatic to fatal. In the absence of clinical trials and guidelines, with hospitalizations and mortality mounting, it is prudent to deploy treatment for COVID-19 based on pathophysiological principles.
A leading U.S. medical journal announced the medicine hydroxychloroquine can effectively treat the coronavirus.
Source: Fox News Dr. Harvey Risch of the Yale School of Public Health and physician Dr. Scott Jensen join ‘The Ingraham Angle’ to discuss the
Source: AAPS Author: Peter McCullough From the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons: It is our honor to bring Dr. McCullough back to “Doctors Are
Source: The Western Journal Author: Erin Coates A new study out of New Jersey shows that the ‘controversial’ antimalarial drug hydroxychloroquine could help people with
Facebook censors argued that the video would encourage people to self-medicate & ignore their doctor’s advice. The oversight board found this to be untrue.
Source: Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine Peter A. McCullough, Paul E. Alexander, Robin Armstrong, Cristian Arvinte, Alan F. Bain, Richard P. Bartlett, Robert L. Berkowitz, Andrew
Based on this real world experience and data, nebulized hydroxychloroquine significantly improves patient outcomes and should be considered as part of the armamentaria against Covid-19.
