Source:The Epoch Times Author: Roger L. Simon

You don’t have to be Emile Zola to say “J’accuse!

I accuse—in no particular order—Time’s ‘Person of the Year’ nominee and frequent Wuhan, China, visitor/collaborator Dr. Anthony Fauci; the Democratic Party (aka the “party of science”) and their nauseating, self-congratulatory leadership; the mainstream media and all their pompous, even more self-congratulatory “ships at sea” from The New York Times to CNN; Dr. Deborah Birx and whatever bureaucrat from the CDC was showing his/her face this week; the endless echo chamber in practically every health department in all 50 states; the foreign health departments that largely echoed that echo chamber; Gov. Andrew Cuomo of New York (more of him in a moment); Gov. Gretchen Whitmer of Michigan; that atrocious governor of Nevada whose name I can’t remember or bother to look up … I could go on all of whom participated in what has emerged to be what is indisputably the greatest national, no, international, health disaster of our time—the Hydroxychloroquine Scandal.

This shameful distortion of medical science was emblematic of how politics not only crept into the treatment of the CCP virus, but bludgeoned that treatment and resulted in untold thousands, perhaps millions, of deaths, while simultaneously making life unbearable for an even greater number across the globe—in fact, for practically everyone.

All of those mentioned above either dismissed or heavily downplayed “hydroxy”—a cheap anti-malarial drug, also used for lupus, that had been around for decades and is known to have minimal side effects—for the treatment of COVID-19.

Why? As most of us are aware, a man they thought an ogre, whom they despised, who knew nothing of science, recommended it—President Donald J. Trump—so it had to be disdained.

And yet hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) apparently did and does work in many instances, if taken early in the illness.

This was known in June 2020, when the esteemed British medical journal Lancet retracted its support of a dubious study it had published opposing the use of HCQ.

“We all entered this collaboration to contribute in good faith and at a time of great need during the COVID-19 pandemic. We deeply apologise to you, the editors, and the journal readership for any embarrassment or inconvenience that this may have caused.”

This apology, made eight months ago, was largely ignored by the mainstream media because it didn’t fit their narrative. And, worse yet, it might have benefited the nefarious Trump.

At the same time, many independent doctors were insisting that HCQ was working for them with real patients. They were similarly dismissed by a rabid press that had neither the inclination nor skills to investigate. (Laura Ingraham, to her credit, featured several of these doctors on her cable show.)

Meanwhile, thousands, if not millions, died across the globe who needn’t have.

How many we will never know, but it’s a safe assumption a good number could have been spared.

The pervasive use of this drug might not have entirely saved us from COVID, but it could arguably have reduced the pandemic to the level of a bad year of flu.

Whatever the truth, an apposite description for what happened might be ‘outrageous’.

And now, the equally esteemed American Journal of Medicine in its January 2021 edition has finally admitted the same thing: HCQ often worked. Immediate administration of the drug, while the patient was still at home, showed significant benefits, they said.

Where were they during the Year of the Pandemic?

Oh, never mind. Politics is more important. So what if there’s a little collateral damage like a country, a world actually, being locked down with children being kept out of school, economies failing, myriad businesses closing never to return, mass unemployment, and, not surprisingly, a spike in suicides, not to mention illnesses, some terminal, left untreated that normally were?

And, needless to say, when it comes to medical science, what is declared true in the United States has serious ramifications across the globe because “the whole world is watching,” and often imitating, what happens here. Everyone pays attention, unfortunately, in this case, too much attention.

After all, they got to hear quarantine faker Chris Cuomo set things to right, ridiculing the idiocy of hydroxychloroquine on CNN International.

Speaking of which, and speaking of politics bludgeoning medical science, we have new disturbing (to put it mildly) information about his brother, Gov. Andrew Cuomo, the man who paraded himself daily and endlessly—with constant media fawning—on television as the savior of New York, possibly the nation.

We now learn this mega-narcissist was all the while underplaying—by roughly 50 percent—the nursing home deaths for which he was at least partly responsible. And we were so informed by a Democratic New York state attorney general, of all people. (Unlike the MSM, she should be applauded for having the guts to tell the truth.)

Being a fake must be the family business.

It’s a classic case of “what did he know and when did he know it,” but don’t expect to have an answer to that question any time soon. (Gov. Cuomo dismisses his AG’s report, pointing his finger, you may be shocked to hear, at the previous presidential administration.)

So where are we? Not in a happy place, I’m afraid, though, thanks to the “election” of Joe Biden, political leaders who previously instituted the most onerous of lockdowns are suddenly lightening up. Your favorite corner Thai place may actually survive. Be pleased about that and try to enjoy the benefits of hypocrisy.

But be extra careful when that so-called “party of science” continues to sell you its bill of science goods as the new administration’s “climate envoy,” John Kerry, just did, asserting that this year’s climate summit in Scotland is the world’s “last best chance” to avert climate catastrophe.

I have a suspicion, as cartoonist Josh wittily observes here, that there will be many more “last best chances” to come.







Related: HCQ Peer-reviewed: Pathophysiological Basis and Rationale for Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection

Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin: The medical establishment’s war on COVID therapeutics

Ivermectin for Covid-19: Database of all Ivermectin COVID-19 studies – 35 trials and growing

Multifaceted highly targeted sequential multidrug treatment of early ambulatory high-risk COVID-19 infection includes HCQ & Ivermectin

HCQ and Ivermectin included in multifaceted highly targeted sequential multidrug treatment of early ambulatory high-risk COVID-19

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on whatsapp
On Trend

Latest Stories

American Hero: Ralph C. Lorigo Fights for Client Rights Including Access to Ivermectin for COVID-19 Patients At Risk

Lorigo shared with TrialSite that once doctors learn of all of the studies around the world, and start doing their own homework, they become more open-minded, factoring in the risk-reward analysis. Especially if elderly high risk patients present advanced COVID-19, Lorigo has personally seen the drug potentially contribute to saving the lives of clients. Interestingly, the attorney reports that it would appear that hospital administrations are the most recalcitrant to the idea, even if the patients and the ICU doctor are in support.

Read More »