The Palmer Foundation

Category: Opinion

Hydroxychloroquine or Ivermectin? The Netherlands’ Nonsense Beats Australia’s !!!

28/03/2021 No Comments

Did the Netherlands work out that early outpatient treatment using hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin & other drugs, hospitalisations can reduce by 80% or more?
It would take just a few weeks to bring down new hospitalizations for COVID-19 to around 40 per day in the country, if general practitioners were authorized to treat the disease early, using a range of early treatment medications, including those now exposing doctors to penalties of up to 150,000 euros!

Read More »

The Chloroquine Wars Part VI – The Simple Logic of the Hydroxychloroquine Hypothesis

17/03/2021 No Comments

The Hydroxychloroquine Hypothesis: That there is some appropriate dosage of hydroxychloroquine, alone or in some combination with other medication, that successfully prevents some COVID-19 cases (PrEP/PEP) or treats some COVID-19 sufferers (Early/Late/Critical).
Remaining entirely unblemished after a year of trials and observations, the current evidence in favor of the Primary HCQ Hypothesis fully validates the HCQ Hypothesis. The logic is so simple that it almost feels like your livelihood would have to be on the line to deny it.

Read More »

Censorship Kills: The Shunning of a COVID Therapeutic

10/03/2021 No Comments

The science shows that ivermectin works. Over 40 randomized trials and observational studies from around the world attest to its efficacy against the novel coronavirus. Meta-analyses by four separate research groups, including ours, found an average reduction in mortality of between 68%-75%. And 10 of 13 randomized controlled trials found statistically significant reductions in time to viral clearance, an effect not associated with any other COVID-19 therapeutic. Furthermore, ivermectin has an unparalleled safety record and low cost, which should negate any fears or resistance to immediate adoption.

Read More »

The Chloroquine Wars Part IV

07/03/2021 No Comments

Why then does the pharmaceutical industry and its promoters insist on conducting RCTs before something is accepted as true? RCTs take substantial amounts of time and significant resources to conduct. This creates a barrier to entry, especially for inexpensive solutions to medical problems. In other words, the myth that RCTs are some necessary “gold standard” is a deception that, along with regulatory agency, prevent any possibility for simpler and less expensive (less profitable) medical solutions to gain traction.

Read More »

We learn that 30 million Indians have been cured by ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, but donkeys everywhere, like Véran or Wargon, claim that there is no cure…

07/03/2021 No Comments

India has conquered the disease with hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, uses a traditional vaccine, exports experimental vaccines for these idiotic Westerners … There are 1,230 deaths per million inhabitants over 65 (six times less than in France). If we had listened to Raoult and followed the Indian model, today we would have 500 cases of covid per day and 75,000 fewer deaths …

Read More »

The Chloroquine Wars Part III

06/03/2021 No Comments

If the argument rests on “RCTs as the gold standard”, there is little doubt that the evidence dramatically favors using HCQ as a standard early stage therapeutic! But it is reasonable to assess the quality of all the evidence to reach beyond gold for the ultimate and supreme standards of scientific evidence. That too we plan to present in future articles.

Read More »

Professor Risch Responds to Dr Rushworth over Hydroxychloroquine Post

04/03/2021 No Comments

“As a clinician, you should know that Covid-19 outpatient disease is viral replication, vs hospitalized disease which is florid pneumonia. These are absolutely different conditions and studies of the treatment of one cannot be extrapolated to the treatment of the other.
This massive body of evidence, summarized by the Cochrane Library, demonstrates that well-conducted hydroxychloroquine observational studies on average, produce very similar associations as the corresponding RCTs.

Read More »

The Chloroquine Wars Part II

03/03/2021 No Comments

On face, it certainly appears that complete silence in the public sphere about hydroxychloroquine’s potential was coordinated by powerful media forces.

Read More »

The Chloroquine Wars: Part I

03/03/2021 No Comments

A famous infectious diseases specialist from France, Dr. Didier Raoult, devised treatments for the bacterial infections that cause Q fever and Whipple’s disease. If all that weren’t enough, hydroxychloroquine has anti-thrombotic properties, meaning it reduces blood clotting for patients suffering excessive clotting. It even inhibits autophagy (cellular self-destruction) setting up hydroxychloroquine for research as a unique cancer medication. No other medicine discovered, isolated, or engineered does all of these things. Most importantly during the recent pandemic, hydroxychloroquine, like quinine, also demonstrates antiviral activity. In short, hydroxychloroquine is a gift from nature—one of the most broadly effective and repurposed drugs in the history of medicine. Billions of doses of hydroxychloroquine are distributed annually, and the WHO includes it in its list of essential medicines.

Read More »

Killing the cure: The strange war against hydroxychloroquine

23/02/2021 No Comments

The UK has had the ignominious triumph of having one of the world’s highest death rates. Some see the solution in continuing lockdowns, more testing and ultimately the vaccine. We argue that the solution lies in medical treatments, such as hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin rather than in vaccination. But hydroxychloroquine was ruled out as a potential treatment for covid19 quite early on. This is despite the fact that, when used correctly, it is a highly efficacious treatment. Had it been readily available as a prophylactic or early stage treatment we would need neither lockdowns nor vaccinations and dramatically fewer people would have died. However this didn’t happen. Here we intend to explore why.

Read More »

Facebook Suspends Craig Kelly For Posts Citing Medical Professionals

17/02/2021 No Comments

“The effect of censoring debate on these early treatments could have possibly been responsible for the death of hundreds of thousands of people.
So, where we should have been having more open debate and more free debate, shutting down debate is likely to have killed people. Not just one or two people, but probably hundreds of thousands. This is why throughout the last 250 years people have said free speech is so important. This is why people have said, ‘I may not agree with what you say but I’ll fight to my death your right to say it.’”

Read More »

Follow the Money: Hydroxychloroquine vs. the “Vaccine”

16/02/2021 No Comments

With a medical establishment seemingly hell-bent on making billions of dollars instead of providing a viable, effective, low-cost pre-hospital treatment, Dr. Zelenko suffered the fate so many have experience since Nov. 4 of 2020. The life-saving information he shared on Twitter was cut off because they terminated his account without warning.

Read More »

Covid-19: Ivermectin treatment successes already a victim of dishonest attacks

14/02/2021 No Comments

Ivermectin: There is a technique of discrediting which is all the rage, always to manipulate: to criticize the form, to make forget the main one: the result. Virtually all of the studies cited by the paper are 95% criticized on form and not on substance, leading to the conclusion, despite results that even a 5-year-old would find obvious, that there is insufficient evidence. If, one day, public domain Ivermectin becomes THE drug against Sars-Cov-2, that will result in billions of losses for the global pharmaceutical industry.

Read More »

Dr Vladimir Zelenko and Craig Kelly MP: Vaccine or Experimental Gene Therapy?

11/02/2021 No Comments

Anyone under the age of 45 with no medical problems has a 99.998% chance of recovery from Covid-19 without intervention with minor symptoms. Question – is there any point in vaccinating this age group? Will it stop the spread? Dr Zelenko observes that “medical textbooks have certain criteria for ‘what’s considered a vaccine'”.
“What we’re talking about with the Moderna and the Pfizer, is experimental gene therapy that hasn’t been approved. It only has an ‘Emergency Use Authorisation’ for experimental gene therapy.”

Read More »

Dr Vladimir Zelenko and Craig Kelly MP: Stop the fear mongering

11/02/2021 No Comments

Knowledge is the power to remove the fear. Prophylaxis and early treatment is absolutely possible. Treatment costs are very cheap, available by mouth and safe. The treament protocol has been replicated dozens of times by world class researchers and they all conclude that there is an 85% reduction in hospitalisation and death IF you treat people early.

Read More »

Dr Vladimir Zelenko and Craig Kelly MP: Politics is a blood sport

11/02/2021 No Comments

Dr Zelenko wryly observed that in Australia, Professor Borody knew that the Zelenko treatment ‘won’t fly’ and offered up an alternative solution: ivermectin, doxycycline and zinc.
The reason it ‘won’t fly’? Politics. The streets of the earth are quite literally saturated with the blood of the innocent, due to political interference in medical treatment.

Read More »

Dr Vladimir Zelenko and Craig Kelly MP: Who do you put your trust in?

11/02/2021 No Comments

Mainstream media has dropped the ball terribly as they spin their own one-sided narrative on Covid-19. Life-saving peer-reviewed studies are continually blocked by the media giants. Join MP Craig Kelly and Dr Vladimir Zelenko as they discuss media bias, where that leaves the citizens of the world, and who they should put their trust into.

Read More »

How Many Americans Has the American Medical Establishment Killed?

09/02/2021 No Comments

I am specifically referring to hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. These drugs (along with zinc), which are as safe as any medicines humanity has taken in the last half-century, should have been almost universally used to treat COVID-19 patients as soon as those patients showed symptoms or tested positive — and even as a prophylactic to prevent or minimize the effects of the illness in the first place. If they had been, it is likely that tens, maybe hundreds, of thousands of those who died of the virus would have lived. Given how safe hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin are, what could we have possibly lost by allowing millions of people to take these medicines?

Read More »
Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter

Copyright 2020 © The Palmer Foundation