Letter to Australian Government’s Department of Health to recommend ivermectin
One such drug is ivermectin, a safe medicine which has been used for nearly 40 years to treat parasitic infections. New evidence show that it has
One such drug is ivermectin, a safe medicine which has been used for nearly 40 years to treat parasitic infections. New evidence show that it has
An in-depth interview with Dr. Tess Lawrie of EBMC Squared describing the effectiveness of long-time safe medicine ivermectin to treat and prevent covid and how health authorities are systematically ignoring the evidence.
The data from the vaccine trials must be recalculated under the lens that some of the serious adverse events (SAEs) should be treated as COVID-19 cases.
There may not be any vaccine efficacy in the data at all if some of the post-vaccination deaths are due to vaccine-induced COVID-19. It could even be the case that the mortality efficacy goes negative. My implied lives saved calculations put this easily in the realm of possibility. The only way to know is for authorities to organize and compile the data. And while a risk analysis is certainly due after more than six months of hundreds of millions of doses delivered, there is little indication authorities have bothered with the process. That’s more than a bit unsettling.
The Roman/Hernandez meta-analysis comes at a politically contentious moment. Their language and behavior appear political. Their work is error-laden, takes research out of its true context, uses numbers that don’t seem to come from the actual studies, chooses papers testing ivermectin under the least favorable circumstances, gives unexplained and inappropriate weights to the small amount of data that stands as outliers to the bigger picture, and still drives a conclusion of “don’t use this” from a massive average mortality reduction that did not quite reach statistical significance. At the same time the authors consistently complain about the “low quality of evidence” represented by the studies they do and do not include, nearly all of which I would describe as produced by higher quality scientists who can at least tally numbers correctly.
The authors concluded based on this extensive review that ivermectin actually reduced the risk of death compared with no ivermectin (average risk ratio 0.38, 95% CI 0.19-0.73; n = 2438; I2 = 49%; moderate-certainty evidence).
Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally.
In absolute honesty, I don’t think vaccines are even necessary. Why are they not necessary? Well that’s because there are at least four or five safe and effective medicines and their presence has been suppressed and hidden from the public, so they’re not really necessary.
TrialSite hosted the first international Ivermectin for Covid Summit webinar on Sunday, May 23rd 2021. The event was widely attended with medical experts presenting from around the world to a global audience of interested parties in the thousands.
TrialSite hosted the first international Ivermectin for Covid Summit webinar on Sunday, May 23rd 2021. The event was widely attended with medical experts presenting from around the world to a global audience of interested parties in the thousands.
If you were going to try and design a drug, for the disease that we call COVID-19, you would want something with heavy anti-viral properties, as well as anti-inflammatory properties.
When you think about that, it’s hard to come up with a better drug for Covid than ivermectin. It literally does both of those things simultaneously, and it’s one of the safest drugs known to man.
Medical experts from around the world joined together to present the very latest real world research on repurposing this safe drug that has the ability to transform global efforts to fight the pandemic. Prof. Héctor Carvallo shares his experiences with using ivermectin for long covid in Argentina.
The International Ivermectin for Covid Conference: Dr. Wasif Khan presents his published ivermectin trial and his experience with using ivermectin in Bangladesh.
Medical experts from around the world joined together to present the very latest real world research on repurposing this safe drug that has the ability to transform global efforts to fight the pandemic. Prof. Pierre Kory discusses current protocols for covid-19 prevention and treatment.
The International Ivermectin for Covid Conference: Professor Eli Schwartz shares data and conclusions from his Israeli randomised controlled trial of ivermectin in mild to moderate covid-19.
British Ivermectin Recommendation Development (BIRD) is campaigning for UK approval for ivermectin to help it beat Covid. Dr Tess Lawrie wraps up their first International ivermectin conference. This is her powerful and impassioned speech.
As Head of the Department of Medical Ethics and Law, Medical Faculty, University of Maribor, Slovenia, Prof. Matjaž Zwitter presents current ethical issues around ivermectin for covid-19. His two papers on ivermectin for Covid-19, as published in Slovenian medical journal Isis and in leading newspaper Delo stirred a vivid debate among medical and lay community, hopefully leading to a change in current medical practice.
Dr. Manjul Medhi shares his front-line experiences in treating acute and long covid including using ivermectin in patients at risk of disseminated strongyloides infection.
The first-ever conference focusing on the use of ivermectin (IVM) as a prophylaxis and treatment for covid-19 was held online April 24-25 2021. Dr Tina Peers, UK GP describes her real-world experiences treating Long Covid.
The International Ivermectin for Covid Conference: Dr. David Chesler shares his experience of using ivermectin to prevent and treat covid-19 infection amongst care home residents.
The International Ivermectin for Covid Conference:
Dr. Tess Lawrie presents the latest systematic review evidence from RCTs and a selection of resource, equity, acceptability and feasibility considerations related to ivermectin use for COVID-19
Medical experts from around the world joined together to present the very latest real world research on repurposing this safe drug that has the ability to transform global efforts to fight the pandemic. In this talk, speaker Dr. Mobeen Syed provides an overview of ivermectin and how it works against covid-19.
HCQ is effective for COVID-19. The probability that an ineffective treatment generated results as positive as the 235 studies to date is estimated to be 1 in 6 quadrillion (p = 0.00000000000000018).
Early treatment is most successful, with 100% of 29 studies reporting a positive effect (13 statistically significant in isolation) and an estimated reduction of 65% in the effect measured (death, hospitalization, etc.) using a random effects meta-analysis, RR 0.35 [0.25-0.50].
92% of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) for early, PrEP, or PEP treatment report positive effects, the probability of this happening for an ineffective treatment is 0.0017.
In an interview with Alan Jones, Craig Kelly MP discusses the vaccine rollout mishaps and yet again, rightfully points out the myriad of medical specialists around the world who support the use of ivermectin for the prophylaxis and treatment of their Covid-19 patients with the backup of extensive positive data.
The group that didn’t take the ivermectin, over 3 months it was fifty-eight percent. Fifty-eight percent of those doctors, nurses and orderlies contracted coronavirus.
In the 788 group, the same doctors, nurses and orderlies across the 4 hospitals, the number of infections that they had, was zero. ZERO, that were treated with ivermectin.
Reductions in covid-19 deaths and infections may be possible by using ivermectin. Employing ivermectin early on may reduce the number of people progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin could have an impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally.
More than 30 trials across the world found that ivermectin causes ‘repeated, consistent, large magnitude improvements in clinical outcomes’ at all stages of the disease. The peer-reviewed study, to be published in the US journal Frontiers of Pharmacology, says the evidence is so strong that the drug – used to treat head lice and scabies – should become a standard therapy everywhere, so hastening the global recovery.
The UK has had the ignominious triumph of having one of the world’s highest death rates. Some see the solution in continuing lockdowns, more testing and ultimately the vaccine. We argue that the solution lies in medical treatments, such as hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin rather than in vaccination. But hydroxychloroquine was ruled out as a potential treatment for covid19 quite early on. This is despite the fact that, when used correctly, it is a highly efficacious treatment. Had it been readily available as a prophylactic or early stage treatment we would need neither lockdowns nor vaccinations and dramatically fewer people would have died. However this didn’t happen. Here we intend to explore why.
The British Recovery study testing HCQ in patients with COVID-19 used very high doses of hydroxychloroquine, doses that we can qualify as dangerously toxic.
The dose used in the RECOVERY trial, arouses concern because it may have been a disease-aggravating factor negating the therapeutic effect.
Source: HCQMeta.com HCQ is effective for COVID-19 when used early: meta-analysis of 156 studies (Version 28, December 4, 2020) • HCQ is effective for COVID-19.
Source: World Doctors Alliance Data updated daily.Last update 09.11.2020 TOTAL SIGNATURES SO FAR: 41,625 Website data since launch (10.10.2020):Total pageviews: 855,989Total unique visitors: 362,845 INTRODUCTION
Source: Kristian Francisco Milla Nielsen Author: Kristian Francisco Milla Nielsen In most of the western world, two drugs are used in the fight against covid-19.
Source: Camelot TV Network Dr Zelenko, New York, USA, joins John Mappin in the UK to discuss treating COVID-19 with hydroxychloroquine, with the view to
Source: HCQmeta.com • HCQ is effective for COVID-19. The probability that an ineffective treatment generated results as positive as the 132 studies to date is
Source:The Conservative Woman A GROUNDBREAKING study of early treatment of Covid-19 in high-risk patients with ‘The Zelenko Protocol’ (zinc plus low-dose hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin) resulting in
Source: The Guardian Author: Melissa Davey One of the world’s leading medical journals, the Lancet, has reformed its editorial policies following a shocking case of
Source: Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit As the world waits impatiently for a COVID-19 vaccine, an exhaustive review of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine pharmacology suggests
Source: Edmund Fordham With the assistance of professional librarian services, Edmund Fordham unearthed medical documentation dating from the 1918 Spanish Flu epidemic, that observed the
Asian countries overall have fared better in controlling Covid-19, with lower mortality which is due to demographics and use of HCQ.