Source: News Max Author: By Brian Trusdell Photo: Getty

The anti-malarial drug promoted by the US President as a treatment for COVID-19 — and derided by his critics — has been found to help outpatients with the disease, a new peer-reviewed study says.

Only 3% of patients that took hydroxychloroquine along with zinc and the antibiotic azithromycin were hospitalized compared to 15% who did not take it, according to the study published in the International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents.

The study comes following a summer of rancor over the drug. Trump hailed it a potential cure and said this spring he was taking it as a prophylactic, or preventive, medicine.

Others, including “Hawaii 5-0” actor Daniel Dae Kim and Michigan state legislator Rep. Karen Whitsett, hailed the drug as saving their lives.

The British medical journal The Lancet published a story saying the drug was potentially toxic, then withdrew it because the data was fraudulent.

Advocates for hydroxychloroquine claim it might not be effective for patients already hospitalized, but those with milder symptoms could benefit, the Washington Examiner reported.

Related: COVID-19 outpatients – early risk-stratified treatment with zinc plus low dose hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin: a retrospective case series study

Hydroxychloroquine cocktail saves lives of high-risk Covid-19 patients

HCQ is effective for COVID-19 when used early: analysis of 132 studies

Hydroxychloroquine Not Linked to Longer Heart Rhythm Intervals in Rheumatoid Arthritis or Lupus Patients

India: Post Exposure Prophylaxis with Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) for the Prevention of COVID-19, a Myth or a Reality? The PEP-CQ Study

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on whatsapp
On Trend

Latest Stories

Dr. Harvey Risch: Hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin, and Other Therapeutics Highly Effective in Early COVID Treatment

I’ve railed against this in the media that we are a part of, and the way that the propaganda reacts to this is, “Ignore it. Ignore all of this.” I’m saying this now because the general public has to be the one that gets angry. The general public should be furious at the way people have been treated in the country by suppression of these drugs, by that kind of website that suppresses the ability of doctors to practice medicine.

Read More »

A Judge Stands up to a Hospital: “Step Aside” and Give a Dying Man Ivermectin

The judge’s finest moment may have been when he dashed the most glaring myth about ivermectin—that it is not safe, despite decades of use that shows otherwise. Noting that all drugs have side effects, Judge Fullerton listed ivermectin’s effects from a government website.
“(N)umber one, generally well tolerated; number two, dizziness; number three, pruritus; number four, nausea/diarrhea. These are the side effects for the dosage that’s being asked to be administered,” he said. “The risks of these side effects are so minimal that Mr. Ng’s current situation outweighs that risk by one-hundredfold.”

Read More »