Excerpt from The Guardian

The ad quoted the leader of a clinical trial, Prof David Paterson, saying it was not a stretch to describe the drug as a cure. Drug advertising rules state any therapeutic claim made in relation to novel coronavirus must be supported by appropriate evidence and must not mislead.

Australia’s drug regulator, the Therapeutic Goods Administration, has dropped its investigation into newspaper advertisements taken out by the former federal politician Clive Palmer that described a drug unproven in the treatment of Covid-19 as a “cure”.

In March, the TGA confirmed it was looking into Palmer’s two-page ad in the Australian and on Facebook that stated the drug, hydroxychloroquine, when combined with another medication could “wipe out the virus in test tubes”. The ad also quoted the leader of a clinical trial, Prof David Paterson, saying it was not a stretch to describe the drug as a cure. Drug advertising rules state any therapeutic claim made in relation to novel coronavirus must be supported by appropriate evidence and must not mislead.

The ad said Palmer had agreed to personally fund the acquisition or manufacture of 1m doses “to ensure all Australians would have access to the drug as soon as possible”. On Tuesday, Palmer paid for another series of ads in News Corp papers stating he had since bought 32.9m doses of the drug. The federal government confirmed Palmer has a “written arrangement” with the government to acquire the drug for the national medical stockpile.

The Therapeutic Goods Administration said neither the latest ads nor the previous ones were being investigated. “Assessment of Mr Clive Palmer’s advertisements have been concluded and enforcement action is not warranted,” a TGA spokesman said. “The information was assessed as not intended to promote the sale of the product.”

On 16 March, Paterson had appeared on The Project. When asked by Waleed Aly if it was correct to describe the drug as a “cure” rather than just a treatment, Paterson responded: “Absolutely.”

See the original article here: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2020/apr/28/clive-palmer-ad-for-coronavirus-cure-cleared-by-australian-drug-regulator

Foot note: See some examples of studies and treatments that include hydroxychloroquine, that have considerable success.

Sermo Reports: One-Quarter of Global Physicians Agree That Healthcare Workers Should Take Hydroxychloroquine to Prevent COVID-19 Infections; Use of Hydroxychloroquine in Prophylaxis and Even in Undiagnosed Suspected Patient Cases is Seen

Washington Examiner: Agilum analysis – greatest-number-of-survivors-from-hydroxychloroquine-healthcare-analytics-could-provide-a-blueprint-for-coronavirus-treatments/

Agilum Releases Nationwide COVID-19 Real-World Data (RWD) Survival Rate Analytics

Les Echos – Didier Raoult unveils to Emmanuel Macron a study of 1061 patients, estimating 91% the effectiveness of his treatment against the coronavirus

WHO global megatrial of the four most promising coronavirus treatments includes hydroxychloroquine

Dr. Stephen Smith on effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine: ‘I think this is the beginning of the end of the pandemic’

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on whatsapp
On Trend

Latest Stories

Stark madness to ban ivermectin

Buried in the note is the real reason for making ivermectin inaccessible – the fear that persons taking it ‘may elect not to be vaccinated as part of the national Covid-19 vaccination program’. This is outrageous. When someone is infected with Covid, it is too late to bother with vaccination. They need early treatment. To deny it to coerce them into accepting a vaccine, one of whose side-effects is death, is immoral.

Read More »

Australia’s TGA Bans GPs from Prescribing Ivermectin

Australia’s medicine and therapeutic regulatory, the Therapeutic Good Administration (TGA) recently took the gloves off with Ivermectin, the economical anti-parasitic drug associated with at least 63 completed clinical trials involving SARS-CoV-2, the virus behind COVID-19. Now TGA formally places a national prohibition on off-label prescribing of ivermectin to all general practitioners. A comparable move as to what TGA did with hydroxychloroquine in 2020. Clearly further evidence of tightening encroachment of the critically important doctor-patient treatment relationship allowing consent to medical treatment using off-label medications. Of course, this isn’t occurring in a vacuum—it’s part of an unfolding, integrated and what have the signs of a coordinated and orchestrated government action to stop any and all treatments other than those the government declares acceptable.

Read More »