Excerpt from The Guardian

The ad quoted the leader of a clinical trial, Prof David Paterson, saying it was not a stretch to describe the drug as a cure. Drug advertising rules state any therapeutic claim made in relation to novel coronavirus must be supported by appropriate evidence and must not mislead.

Australia’s drug regulator, the Therapeutic Goods Administration, has dropped its investigation into newspaper advertisements taken out by the former federal politician Clive Palmer that described a drug unproven in the treatment of Covid-19 as a “cure”.

In March, the TGA confirmed it was looking into Palmer’s two-page ad in the Australian and on Facebook that stated the drug, hydroxychloroquine, when combined with another medication could “wipe out the virus in test tubes”. The ad also quoted the leader of a clinical trial, Prof David Paterson, saying it was not a stretch to describe the drug as a cure. Drug advertising rules state any therapeutic claim made in relation to novel coronavirus must be supported by appropriate evidence and must not mislead.

The ad said Palmer had agreed to personally fund the acquisition or manufacture of 1m doses “to ensure all Australians would have access to the drug as soon as possible”. On Tuesday, Palmer paid for another series of ads in News Corp papers stating he had since bought 32.9m doses of the drug. The federal government confirmed Palmer has a “written arrangement” with the government to acquire the drug for the national medical stockpile.

The Therapeutic Goods Administration said neither the latest ads nor the previous ones were being investigated. “Assessment of Mr Clive Palmer’s advertisements have been concluded and enforcement action is not warranted,” a TGA spokesman said. “The information was assessed as not intended to promote the sale of the product.”

On 16 March, Paterson had appeared on The Project. When asked by Waleed Aly if it was correct to describe the drug as a “cure” rather than just a treatment, Paterson responded: “Absolutely.”

See the original article here: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2020/apr/28/clive-palmer-ad-for-coronavirus-cure-cleared-by-australian-drug-regulator

Foot note: See some examples of studies and treatments that include hydroxychloroquine, that have considerable success.

Sermo Reports: One-Quarter of Global Physicians Agree That Healthcare Workers Should Take Hydroxychloroquine to Prevent COVID-19 Infections; Use of Hydroxychloroquine in Prophylaxis and Even in Undiagnosed Suspected Patient Cases is Seen

Washington Examiner: Agilum analysis – greatest-number-of-survivors-from-hydroxychloroquine-healthcare-analytics-could-provide-a-blueprint-for-coronavirus-treatments/

Agilum Releases Nationwide COVID-19 Real-World Data (RWD) Survival Rate Analytics

Les Echos – Didier Raoult unveils to Emmanuel Macron a study of 1061 patients, estimating 91% the effectiveness of his treatment against the coronavirus

WHO global megatrial of the four most promising coronavirus treatments includes hydroxychloroquine

Dr. Stephen Smith on effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine: ‘I think this is the beginning of the end of the pandemic’

On Trend

Latest Stories

Palmer welcomes lift of hydroxychloroquine ban

Chief Health Officer (CHO) John Gerrard has now revoked the 2020 direction, stating on the Queensland Health website:
“I, Dr John Gerrard, Chief Health Officer, reasonably believe it is necessary to give the following direction pursuant to the powers under s362B of the Public Health Act 2005 to assist in contain, or to respond to, the spread of COVID-19 within the community.”
Mr Palmer has been a strong supporter of the use of hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of COVID-19, purchasing 37 million doses of the drug for Australians at the start of the outbreak.

Read More »

Dr. Harvey Risch: Hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin, and Other Therapeutics Highly Effective in Early COVID Treatment

I’ve railed against this in the media that we are a part of, and the way that the propaganda reacts to this is, “Ignore it. Ignore all of this.” I’m saying this now because the general public has to be the one that gets angry. The general public should be furious at the way people have been treated in the country by suppression of these drugs, by that kind of website that suppresses the ability of doctors to practice medicine.

Read More »