Source: Q-Costerica

Why is Costa Rica’s hospitalisation rate lower for COVID-19 than most of the world?

Dr. Román Macaya, executive president of the Costa Rican Social Security Fund (CCSS), explained why on Monday, saying that there are many factors, including:

  • Daily follow-up by doctors to patients through phone calls.
  • Symptom monitoring. When a patient requires hospitalization, all logistics are coordinated to make the transfer.
  • The use of hydroxychloroquine.

Costa Rica had resumed the use of hydroxychloroquine after the medical journal, The Lancet, retracted the results of the study that led the World Health Organization (WHO) suspension of the use of the drug.

“That study generated enormous questioning and criticism for the inconsistencies in the data. In fact, the same company that conducted the study is under investigation,”

Dr. Román Macaya executive president CCSS

A few days ago Macaya explained that, although the average ‘positive’ is 14 days, there are patients in Costa Rica who continue to test positive for COVID-19 after 60 days.

Those patients who tested positive for longer than 14 days were categorized as: those with compromised health and hospitalized (even in an Intensive Care Unit) and those who continue to test positive even though they are at home, even asymptomatic.

Why would they continue testing positive? Well, there are a few different possibilities. The first is that the PCR technique, which is the one used to detect the virus, may be detecting a particle of the virus, RNA – which is the chain of genetic material that is amplified to detect the virus – and that, only that present and not the virus, that is, not necessarily because they are positive, it means that they have the active virus in their body.

“There is no evidence that they are contagious or that they will have a worse prognosis in the future, but despite this, they must remain under the health order as a precautionary measure,” he explained.

Another possibility is that the replacement of the airways can take up to 3 months, that is, the process of releasing all the virus particles takes a long time.

“There are also patients who test positive, then negative, and then positive and are in that alternation. There is a reason for this; when the sample is taken, the sample is insufficient to amplify the genetic material of the virus and detect it, and this may be generating a false negative.

“No test is 100% sensitive. In these cases where there is a change, there is no evidence that they are relapses in the disease or that they are likely to worsen over time,” stressed the doctor.


Costa Rica will continue to use hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID-19

Hydroxychloroquine: The Drug Costa Rica Uses Successfully To Fight Covid-19

Costa Rica using hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 treatment

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on whatsapp
On Trend

Latest Stories

Dr. Harvey Risch: Hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin, and Other Therapeutics Highly Effective in Early COVID Treatment

I’ve railed against this in the media that we are a part of, and the way that the propaganda reacts to this is, “Ignore it. Ignore all of this.” I’m saying this now because the general public has to be the one that gets angry. The general public should be furious at the way people have been treated in the country by suppression of these drugs, by that kind of website that suppresses the ability of doctors to practice medicine.

Read More »

A Judge Stands up to a Hospital: “Step Aside” and Give a Dying Man Ivermectin

The judge’s finest moment may have been when he dashed the most glaring myth about ivermectin—that it is not safe, despite decades of use that shows otherwise. Noting that all drugs have side effects, Judge Fullerton listed ivermectin’s effects from a government website.
“(N)umber one, generally well tolerated; number two, dizziness; number three, pruritus; number four, nausea/diarrhea. These are the side effects for the dosage that’s being asked to be administered,” he said. “The risks of these side effects are so minimal that Mr. Ng’s current situation outweighs that risk by one-hundredfold.”

Read More »