In a document posted on the Internet site of the IHU Méditerranée infection by Pr Didier Raoult, we discover a letter signed by the President of Sanofi and addressed to the Minister of Health Olivier Veran. 

In this letter, the pharmaceutical company details the regulatory reasons for which it has decided not to honor orders for Plaquenil from the AP-HM. 

By unveiling this letter, Professor Raoult hopes to obtain a clarification of the position of the Ministry of Health on the treatments it delivers to its patients suffering from Covid-19.

In this letter, Olivier Bogillot, the president of Sanofi explains that he receives “numerous and recurring requests from the AP-HM and more particularly from the department of Professor Didier Raoult to provide this product. This specialty marketed under the name Plaquenil® 200 mg is widely prescribed by doctors from the IHU of infectious diseases in Marseille in the context of the Covid-19 epidemic.  ”

Plaquenil & COVID-19, neither Marketing Authorization, nor exemption for a prescription outside Marketing Authorization, according to SANOFI

Olivier Bogillot explains that despite the lack of MA for Plaquenil in the treatment of COVID-19 and after the end of the derogatory measures granted to hydroxychloroquine in this indication on May 27, the French laboratory received Large orders of Plaquenil in September 2020 from pharmacists at AP-HM. He informs the Minister of Health that the laboratory has decided not to honor these orders for these reasons and in the absence of a new Temporary Recommendation for Use [RTU], or the implementation of a clinical study within the meaning of l ‘Article L. 1121-1 of the CSP

“  We reminded the AP-HM, by letter of August 26, 2020, of our obligations in terms of proper use and compliance with the terms of the MA for this treatment, and that it does not benefit to date from any Marketing Authorization whether in France or elsewhere in the world, for an indication relating to the treatment of COVID-19.  ”

The freedom to prescribe outside the Marketing Authorization is understood on a case-by-case basis for SANOFI

For the French laboratory, the freedom of prescription outside Marketing Authorization as defined in article R.4127-8 of the Public Health Code, cannot apply in the case of the IHU Mediterranean Infection because the services of Professor Raoult organizes this prescription on a large scale while this freedom of prescription is provided only on a case-by-case basis in the interest of the patient.

“  The prescription of an off-label drug by a doctor is in fact understood on a case-by-case basis , must be in the patient’s interest, and justified by the data acquired from science. These conditions are no longer met insofar as the AP-HM organizes this prescription on a large scale even though the data acquired from science and the interest for patients have not been demonstrated (ANSM decision relating to RTU ). 

Sanofi relies on the wisdom of Olivier Veran

“Thus, apart from any official recommendation that could, if applicable, emanate from your Ministry regarding the off-label use of our specialty Plaquenil® in the context of the management of Covid-19, I wanted you to inform us that it is impossible for us to follow up on orders for the AP-HM in still large quantities […] today I wish to rely on the wisdom of the Government and more specifically that of your Ministry, alone legitimate to decide this delicate question. “

After the ANSM, Pr Raoult engages in a standoff with Oliver Veran

In a video titled “Sanofi or Ministry: who is blocking the sale of hydroxychloroquine?” and posted on the Internet, Professor Raoult explains that he disclosed this letter so that the Ministry of Health could clarify its position on the subject.

For the infectious disease specialist, one of two things, namely SANOFI “ lies ” and “ it is refusal to sell ” because “ SANOFI does not have to know for what we use the drugs that we receive in the hospital ”, or it is the ministry which “ tries to go through a biased relationship with SANOFI ” to prevent the delivery of a “ drug which is unquestionably considered effective in ¾ of the countries of the world ”.“ 

I hope that the Minister will answer this question so that we will see who… is lying in this story ” Pr RAOULT

Finally, Professor Raoult explains the reasons which led him to bring the director of the ANSM before the courts . “ The answer given to us by the director of the ANSM is absolutely unreasonable in terms of scientific reasoning… They did not consult me… to my knowledge they did not consult Sanofi. It is not a reasoned decision, but a personal decision… I consider that it plays a dangerous role for the health of the French ”.

HCQ is effective for COVID-19 when used early: analysis of 132 studies

SANOFI Asks French Health Minister Permission to Deliver Hydroxychloroquine to Professor Raoult’s Hospital

Didier Raoult and the IHU will contest the refusal of the National Medicines Safety Agency to authorize the use of hydroxychloroquine against Covid-19.

France: Philippe Douste-Blazy shoots red bullets on the State and relaunches the debate on hydroxychloroquine

Study: Anti-Malarial Drug HCQ Helps Outpatients With COVID-19

Open letter to the President of the Republic of France by Didier van Cauwelaert

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on whatsapp
On Trend

Latest Stories

Dr. Harvey Risch: Hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin, and Other Therapeutics Highly Effective in Early COVID Treatment

I’ve railed against this in the media that we are a part of, and the way that the propaganda reacts to this is, “Ignore it. Ignore all of this.” I’m saying this now because the general public has to be the one that gets angry. The general public should be furious at the way people have been treated in the country by suppression of these drugs, by that kind of website that suppresses the ability of doctors to practice medicine.

Read More »

A Judge Stands up to a Hospital: “Step Aside” and Give a Dying Man Ivermectin

The judge’s finest moment may have been when he dashed the most glaring myth about ivermectin—that it is not safe, despite decades of use that shows otherwise. Noting that all drugs have side effects, Judge Fullerton listed ivermectin’s effects from a government website.
“(N)umber one, generally well tolerated; number two, dizziness; number three, pruritus; number four, nausea/diarrhea. These are the side effects for the dosage that’s being asked to be administered,” he said. “The risks of these side effects are so minimal that Mr. Ng’s current situation outweighs that risk by one-hundredfold.”

Read More »