Source: Detroit Metro Times

Detroit headed up the first large-scale study of the drug as a potential preventive measure against COVID-19 at Henry Ford Health System. However, in recent weeks the drug has seen a string of bad publicity from main stream media using only bad study examples as penultimate proof, whilst ignoring dozens of studies showing efficacy. On Monday, much to the surprise of the dozens of postive HCQ trials doctors and scientists, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration withdrew its emergency use authorization for hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 patients, based on a press release from a British trial and several other studies that are not peer reviewed.

See: FDA ENABLES use of HCQ in a weird round about win – by revoking EUA. Says they never restricted it.

Henry Ford Health System, however, says the FDA’s new reversal does not impact its study, which is is expected to wrap up in July.

The FDA’s decision bars the use of hydroxychloroquine sulfate and a similar drug called chloroquine phosphate from the Strategic National Stockpile for hospitalized COVID-19 patients. But the use of the drug as a prophylaxis, or preventive measure, is not impacted by the FDA decision.

“The ongoing WHIP COVID-19 study is an FDA-approved study looking at hydroxychloroquine as a potential preventative medication for healthy, pre-screened individuals,” Dr. Steven Kalkanis, chief executive officer of the Henry Ford Medical Group, told Metro Times in a statement on Monday.

“It is not affected by the FDA’s decision today, and there is no evidence that the use of hydroxychloroquine as a potential prophylaxis presents a health risk in that setting.”

Dr. Steven Kalkanis, chief executive officer of the Henry Ford Medical Group

Kalkanis says hydroxychloroquine has been used as a treatment in hospitalized patients, which falls under the FDA’s Monday directive. The early results of a retrospective study looking at the drug as a treatment look promising, but the results are not final and still pending peer review.

“We have analyzed our data and have seen a significantly improved outcome in a group of COVID-19 patients who received hydroxychloroquine,” he said.

Dr. Steven Kalkanis, chief executive officer of the Henry Ford Medical Group

In response to the FDA decision, Henry Ford Health System suspended the use of hydroxychloroquine as a COVID-19 treatment outside of clinical trials.

“The safety and wellbeing of our patients remains our top priority and we will continue to monitor all available data regarding safety and outcomes and adjust accordingly,” Kalkanis said.

Another study at University of Michigan is also still moving forward.

On Tuesday, officials announced potential in another drug. Scientists at the University of Oxford, the same University that Press released that hydroxychloroquine was no good when administered in potentially lethal doses, gave another press release that said a steroid called dexamethasone was found to reduce the number of deaths in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Immediately tabloids around the globe have embraced this press release that has no scientific study data released at this stage.


Study – Clinical Efficacy of Chloroquine derivatives in COVID-19 Infection: Comparative meta-analysis between the Big data and the real world (19,270 patients – is effective)

Study: Pre exposure Hydroxychloroquine use reduces COVID19 risk in healthcare workers

Indonesia Claims Five Drug Combos, including HCQ, Reduce Novel Coronavirus

Egypt reveals results of hydroxychloroquine for people with coronavirus

Lancet RETRACTS suspect research study of 96,000, which stated HCQ had no effect. Important win for science.

Documentary: Perspectives on the Pandemic | The (Undercover) Epicenter Nurse | Episode Nine

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on whatsapp
On Trend

Latest Stories

Dr. Harvey Risch: Hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin, and Other Therapeutics Highly Effective in Early COVID Treatment

I’ve railed against this in the media that we are a part of, and the way that the propaganda reacts to this is, “Ignore it. Ignore all of this.” I’m saying this now because the general public has to be the one that gets angry. The general public should be furious at the way people have been treated in the country by suppression of these drugs, by that kind of website that suppresses the ability of doctors to practice medicine.

Read More »

A Judge Stands up to a Hospital: “Step Aside” and Give a Dying Man Ivermectin

The judge’s finest moment may have been when he dashed the most glaring myth about ivermectin—that it is not safe, despite decades of use that shows otherwise. Noting that all drugs have side effects, Judge Fullerton listed ivermectin’s effects from a government website.
“(N)umber one, generally well tolerated; number two, dizziness; number three, pruritus; number four, nausea/diarrhea. These are the side effects for the dosage that’s being asked to be administered,” he said. “The risks of these side effects are so minimal that Mr. Ng’s current situation outweighs that risk by one-hundredfold.”

Read More »