Coronavirus: a journalist tells about overnight treatment with hydroxychloroquine “I feel that the viral load has already decreased and most of the symptoms have improved”

Source: France Blue

Paul Molga, journalist for Les Echos in Marseille, tested positive for Covid-19 10 days ago. Suffering from severe symptoms, he decided to follow the controversial treatment recommended by Professor Raoult. It tells about the disease and the effects of the treatment, almost immediate.

It was on September 13 that Paul Molga, journalist for Les Echos in Marseille, felt the first symptoms of Covid-19:  Severe fatigue, headache, severe muscle aches, chills. This is something new in the world. The organism is not really a flu, it is more violent than that. We feel inhabited, by beings, by viruses which are unknown to the body. ” Very quickly, Paul went to the IHU Méditerranée Infection to do the test. The diagnosis falls and after a battery of examinations, the doctors propose to him to follow the treatment of Professor Didier Raoult . 

On Wednesday September 16, drugs on the table, Paul can begin treatment: azithromycin once a day for five days, hydroxychloroquine three times a day combined with zinc. And the effects are very fast.

“Wednesday evening, I take the first meds. Thursday morning, I feel that the viral load has already decreased and most of the symptoms have improved.” – Paul Molga

As the days go by, Paul feels better and better . From Friday, he even has the feeling of not feeling any more symptoms. But he still has to continue the treatment for 10 days. A treatment sometimes acclaimed, sometimes very criticized, especially in the medical community.

Paul Molga assures us that before following him he was “neither anti nor pro Raoult” . He wanted to test to cure himself : “What surprises me is the violence that we inflict on this treatment and on hydroxychloroquine. We did talk about poison when it is a drug that we The effects have been known for 70 years, there are several continents that take them regularly. We have not talked about the death rate associated with taking the drug. “ 

As a journalist he admits to having been curious to test what some call “the druid’s potion” . “I had heard, like many, testimonies from patients who were recovering from the Raoult protocol.” 

“It’s my truth, it’s not an absolute truth. I have been able to test it, I see the effects and I also see people who have not taken treatment and whose symptoms drag on for weeks, even months. “

This Tuesday, September 22, so a little over a week after the first symptoms, Paul Molga feels better, he even dares to pronounce the word “cure” : “I no longer have any symptoms.” 


The war on Hydroxychloroquine can be traced back to Gilead, the drug maker looking to profit big from Remdesivir


France: Natural history of COVID-19 and therapeutic options (hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin and zinc may represent the best current theraputic option)

Coronavirus: remdesivir will not be reimbursed in France

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on whatsapp
On Trend

Latest Stories

Stark madness to ban ivermectin

Buried in the note is the real reason for making ivermectin inaccessible – the fear that persons taking it ‘may elect not to be vaccinated as part of the national Covid-19 vaccination program’. This is outrageous. When someone is infected with Covid, it is too late to bother with vaccination. They need early treatment. To deny it to coerce them into accepting a vaccine, one of whose side-effects is death, is immoral.

Read More »

Australia’s TGA Bans GPs from Prescribing Ivermectin

Australia’s medicine and therapeutic regulatory, the Therapeutic Good Administration (TGA) recently took the gloves off with Ivermectin, the economical anti-parasitic drug associated with at least 63 completed clinical trials involving SARS-CoV-2, the virus behind COVID-19. Now TGA formally places a national prohibition on off-label prescribing of ivermectin to all general practitioners. A comparable move as to what TGA did with hydroxychloroquine in 2020. Clearly further evidence of tightening encroachment of the critically important doctor-patient treatment relationship allowing consent to medical treatment using off-label medications. Of course, this isn’t occurring in a vacuum—it’s part of an unfolding, integrated and what have the signs of a coordinated and orchestrated government action to stop any and all treatments other than those the government declares acceptable.

Read More »