Source: Times of India


NEW DELHI: With hydroxychloroquine regaining its credibility after WHO restarted its trials and the authors of a Lancet study slamming it falling into controversy, India’s Covid-19 diplomacy, of which supply of HCQ to dozens of countries was an important part, could gain ground again.

A global controversy regarding the drug and its efficacy as a prophylactic against Covid-19 or even as a treatment began with studies in respectable journals, the Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine, questioning its use and hinting it could increase mortality rates among patients with a heart condition.

The drug was battling a political controversy with US President not only advocating its use but also announcing that he was taking it. As with many Trump announcements, the declaration sparked a war of words with some US experts warning against its use in Covid-19 treatment protocol though the FDA has defined its use in hospital conditions.

India has remained steadfast in recommending its use as a preventive tool for frontline those in direct contact with Covid-19 patients.

HCQ and paracetamol was supplied to over 133 countries, both as grant as well as on commercial basis, as of mid-May. This includes 446 million HCQ tablets and 1.54 billion paracetamol tablets. So far, 76 countries have been provided with HCQ tablets as grant assistance by India. If HCQ had fallen into disrepute, much of this goodwill would have lost its sheen. India has focused its attention on the immediate neighbourhood which was the first priority, before spreading out its aid to Gulf countries, some Asean countries, African and Latin American countries and central Asia.

For instance, India has earmarked 5 million HCQ tablets for 28 LAC countries and 100,000 each for 19 African countries, as per official sources. By May, India had ramped up production of HCQ production capacity to 300 million tablets per month.

Related: Despite WHO’s Warning, India Continues Use of Hydroxychloroquine as Prevention Measure

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on whatsapp
On Trend

Latest Stories

Dr. Harvey Risch: Hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin, and Other Therapeutics Highly Effective in Early COVID Treatment

I’ve railed against this in the media that we are a part of, and the way that the propaganda reacts to this is, “Ignore it. Ignore all of this.” I’m saying this now because the general public has to be the one that gets angry. The general public should be furious at the way people have been treated in the country by suppression of these drugs, by that kind of website that suppresses the ability of doctors to practice medicine.

Read More »

A Judge Stands up to a Hospital: “Step Aside” and Give a Dying Man Ivermectin

The judge’s finest moment may have been when he dashed the most glaring myth about ivermectin—that it is not safe, despite decades of use that shows otherwise. Noting that all drugs have side effects, Judge Fullerton listed ivermectin’s effects from a government website.
“(N)umber one, generally well tolerated; number two, dizziness; number three, pruritus; number four, nausea/diarrhea. These are the side effects for the dosage that’s being asked to be administered,” he said. “The risks of these side effects are so minimal that Mr. Ng’s current situation outweighs that risk by one-hundredfold.”

Read More »