American Medical Association Resolves to Rescind Ban on HCQ; then Votes to Keep it in Place — How Many People Have Died??

Source: The Gateway Pundit Author: Jim Hoft

This post was updated with the disappointing information that the AMA ultimately rejected resolution 509.

For months The Gateway Pundit has been reporting factually on the evidence and studies that proved Hydroxychloroquine was effecting in the treatment of COVID-19.

Of course, we were hounded by the left and attacked by fake “fact-checkers” labeling our reports as disputed.

Despite its effectiveness, the American Medical Association (AMA) back in March, at the height of the pandemic in the US criticized hydroxychloroquine and its use.

Dr. Fauci led the jihad against this effective drug.

Well, now that hundreds of thousands of Americans are dead “with the virus” or “because of the virus,” and the election season has ended, the AMA recently voted again on their prevention of HQ.

Here is that statement from their October 30th release.

Later during voting, the 509 did NOT pass.
It was one of four or five out of dozens that got to a vote but did not pass.
This is unconscionable.

Thousands died because of these hacks.

LenBilen reported:

Previously, the AMA had issued a statement in March that was highly critical of HCQ in regards to its use as a proposed treatment by some physicians in the early stages of COVID-19. In addition to discouraging doctors from ordering the medication in bulk for “off-label” use – HCQ is typically used to treat diseases such as malaria – they also claimed that there was no proof that it was effective in treating COVID, and that its use could be harmful in some instances.

However, on page 18 of a recent AMA memo, issued on October 30, (resolution 509, page 3) the organization officially reversed its stance on HCQ, stating that its potential for good currently may supersede the threat of any potentially harmful side effects.

The AMA kept the rule in place. How awful.

Related: The AMA Quietly Admits They Lied About Hydroxychloroquine

How hydroxychloroquine works at the cellular level

A massive hydroxychloroquine meta-analysis (156 studies) has just been updated (version 28!).It says that HCQ works beyond all statistical doubt.

‘Only a one in 17 billion chance hydroxychloroquine doesn’t work’: medical professor

Council of State: yes to the use of hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of Covid:

Peer-reviewed hydroxychloroquine study finds 84% fewer hospitalizations among early treated outpatients

HCQ Protocols from America’s Frontline Doctors

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on whatsapp
On Trend

Latest Stories

American Hero: Ralph C. Lorigo Fights for Client Rights Including Access to Ivermectin for COVID-19 Patients At Risk

Lorigo shared with TrialSite that once doctors learn of all of the studies around the world, and start doing their own homework, they become more open-minded, factoring in the risk-reward analysis. Especially if elderly high risk patients present advanced COVID-19, Lorigo has personally seen the drug potentially contribute to saving the lives of clients. Interestingly, the attorney reports that it would appear that hospital administrations are the most recalcitrant to the idea, even if the patients and the ICU doctor are in support.

Read More »